Varvara Gracheva vs Ana Bogdan — Iasi Round of 32

Iasi · WTA · Round of 32
Varvara Gracheva
FRA5
Varvara Gracheva
#88WTA
1810ELO
1701Clay ELO
25 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 July 2025
clay
ROU
Ana Bogdan
#980WTA
33 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLW
Gracheva V.
7-5 6-2
Bogdan A.
Gracheva V.
762
Bogdan A.
520

Varvara Gracheva defeated Ana Bogdan 7-5 6-2 in the Iasi round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Varvara Gracheva came in ranked #88, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Varvara Gracheva extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-08-23Chicago 1R16hardVarvara Gracheva7-5 3-1 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Gracheva V.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Bogdan A.

Bogdan A.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gracheva V.

Serve advantage — Gracheva V.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gracheva V.Bogdan A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
56%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
44%
38%
Break points saved·Even
53%
52%
Aces / match·Even
2.6
2.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (70 vs 12). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gracheva V.Bogdan A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
74
31
Break points saved·Clear edge
76
56
Break points won·Even
87
86
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
22
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
65
47

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gracheva V.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bogdan A.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.1
Surface form
3.4
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Begu I.[7]
Teichmann J.[6]
6-07-5
Semi-finals
Teichmann J.[6]
Cirstea S.
6-46-3
Begu I.[7]
Cristian J.[2]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Cristian J.[2]
Udvardy P.
6-36-4
Teichmann J.[6]
Waltert S.
5-76-17-5
Cirstea S.
Carle M.
6-16-4
Begu I.[7]
Siskova A.
6-23-67-5
R16
Cristian J.[2]
Fett J.
4-1
Siskova A.
Li A.[3]
6-36-3
Carle M.
Avanesyan E.[1]
7-646-2
Cirstea S.
Gracheva V.[5]
6-26-4
Waltert S.
Burillo Escorihuela I.
6-47-62
Teichmann J.[6]
Chwalinska M.
7-656-2
Begu I.[7]
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
3-66-36-3
Udvardy P.
Jones F.[8]
6-46-3
R32
Cristian J.[2]
Lodikova D.
6-16-4
Burillo Escorihuela I.
Parrizas Diaz N.[4]
5-77-54-1
Waltert S.
Sevastova A.
6-36-3
Chwalinska M.
Shymanovich I.
4-66-46-2
Li A.[3]
Maristany Zuleta De Reales G.
3-66-26-2
Jones F.[8]
Herrero Linana A.
6-36-2
Teichmann J.[6]
Bulgaru M.
1-67-626-1
Udvardy P.
Rouvroy M.
6-32-67-5
Avanesyan E.[1]
Prisacariu A.
6-36-3
Begu I.[7]
Hibino N.
6-16-2
Carle M.
Tig P.
2-66-26-2
Gracheva V.[5]
Bogdan A.
7-56-2
Fett J.
Erjavec V.
7-666-2
Siskova A.
Kawa K.
6-44-67-62
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
Popa G.
6-27-5
Cirstea S.
Buzarnescu M.
6-26-2