Liam Draxl vs Alexander Blockx — Granby CH Semi-final

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Liam Draxl
CAN3
Liam Draxl
#158ATP
1592ELO
1565Hard ELO
$201kYTD
$642kCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 July 2025
hard
BEL2
Alexander Blockx
#36ATP
1906ELO
1793Hard ELO
$901kYTD
$1.8MCAREER
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Draxl L.
6-4 7-6
Blockx A.
Draxl L.
6772
Blockx A.
4650

Liam Draxl defeated Alexander Blockx 6-4 7-6 in the Granby CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alexander Blockx came in ranked #36, but Liam Draxl had arrived on a 5-match winning run.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Draxl L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Blockx A.

Blockx A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Draxl L.

Serve advantage — Blockx A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Draxl L.Blockx A.
—
Serve
53
—
Return
42

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Draxl L.Blockx A.
1st serve in·Even
66%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
66%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
5.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 107). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draxl L.Blockx A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
66
71
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
97
Break points won·Slight edge
36
27
Deciding sets·Even
94
95
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
75
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draxl L.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Blockx A.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.2Hard Elo 1565
Surface ELO
7.8+228 Hard Elo edge
1.3Overall Elo 1592
ELO gap
8.7Overall Elo 1906
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
9.3
Surface form
7.5
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
1.3
0.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0
Opponent rise
2.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draxl L.Blockx A.
Freshness·Even
97
94

Draxl L.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Blockx A.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Holmgren A.[6]
Draxl L.[3]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Draxl L.[3]
Blockx A.[2]
6-47-65
Holmgren A.[6]
Spizzirri E.[1]
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Spizzirri E.[1]
Trotter J.[7]
6-46-0
Holmgren A.[6]
Shimizu Y.
6-44-66-3
Blockx A.[2]
Shimabukuro S.[5]
6-26-3
Draxl L.[3]
Galarneau A.
6-14-66-1
R16
Shimizu Y.
Watanuki Y.[4]
W/O
Trotter J.[7]
Kypson P.
7-656-756-4
Holmgren A.[6]
Gengel M.
6-36-4
Galarneau A.
Jasika O.[8]
6-16-1
Blockx A.[2]
Hsu Y.
7-56-0
Spizzirri E.[1]
Zink T.
6-27-63
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Noguchi R.
6-35-76-2
Draxl L.[3]
Van Wyk K.
6-06-1
R32
Shimizu Y.
Wu T.
6-41-67-5
Trotter J.[7]
Arseneault N.
2-67-56-3
Gengel M.
Zhou Y.
6-27-62
Jasika O.[8]
Boulais J.
7-56-2
Galarneau A.
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Van Wyk K.
Rozin S.
6-26-726-3
Blockx A.[2]
Martin A.
7-56-2
Zink T.
Andrade A.
3-67-56-4
Spizzirri E.[1]
Jubb P.
6-46-746-2
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Aguilar J.
6-26-1
Watanuki Y.[4]
Sell K.
6-36-4
Kypson P.
Nakagawa N.
6-36-1
Holmgren A.[6]
Watt J.
6-757-636-4
Hsu Y.
Maloney P.
7-56-3
Draxl L.[3]
Perez A.
3-67-56-2
Noguchi R.
Sekulic P.
6-26-4