Edward Winter vs Connor Thomson — Nottingham 3 CH Round of 16

Nottingham 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS
Edward Winter
#434ATP
1434ELO
1445Grass ELO
21 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 July 2025
grass
GBR
Connor Thomson
#1148ATP
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLLL
Winter E.
6-4 6-1
Thomson C.
Winter E.
662
Thomson C.
410

Edward Winter defeated Connor Thomson 6-4 6-1 in the Nottingham 3 CH round of 16 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Winter E.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Thomson C.

Thomson C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Winter E.

Serve advantage — Winter E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Winter E.Thomson C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
44%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.2
4.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (41 vs 6). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Winter E.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 175 days (−1.5)
Thomson C.
3.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 644 days (−1.5)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Winter E.Thomson C.
Freshness·
81
—

Winter E.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 24 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Pinnington Jones J.[5]
Edmund K.
6-47-61
Semi-finals
Pinnington Jones J.[5]
Crawford O.[3]
6-46-4
Edmund K.
Stewart H.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Edmund K.
Zahraj P.
7-644-3
Stewart H.
Peniston R.[4]
3-67-656-4
Crawford O.[3]
Gray A.[8]
6-767-656-3
Pinnington Jones J.[5]
Winter E.
6-766-36-4
R16
Gray A.
Maxted L.
W/O
Winter E.
Thomson C.
6-46-1
Crawford O.[3]
Ivashka I.
6-06-3
Edmund K.
Broady L.
7-616-2
Peniston R.[4]
Searle H.
4-66-16-2
Stewart H.
Loffhagen G.[7]
6-36-4
Zahraj P.
De Schepper K.
6-36-2
Pinnington Jones J.[5]
Wendelken H.
6-44-66-3
R32
Pinnington Jones J.[5]
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-36-2
De Schepper K.
Martineau M.[6]
7-657-67
Searle H.
Baadi T.
6-26-2
Peniston R.[4]
Jones B.
6-46-3
Maxted L.
Rossi L.
6-46-2
Crawford O.[3]
Broom C.
7-56-3
Wendelken H.
Brady P.
6-36-1
Edmund K.
Hands T.
6-46-4
Stewart H.
Summers M.
7-626-4
Ivashka I.
Reymond A.
5-76-46-4
Loffhagen G.[7]
Robertson C.
6-26-1
Broady L.
Grenier H.[1]
7-656-4
Gray A.[8]
Janvier M.
6-35-77-5
Zahraj P.
Nefve A.
6-46-4
Thomson C.
Story J.
3-66-47-64
Winter E.
Monday J.[2]
2-67-666-2