Rose Marie Nijkamp vs Maria Sara Popa — W35 Amstelveen Round of 64

W35 Amstelveen · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
NED
Rose Marie Nijkamp
#802WTA
20 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 June 2025
clay
ROU
Maria Sara Popa
#427WTA
1412ELO
1395Clay ELO
20 yrs · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLWL
Nijkamp R.
6-7 6-3 6-3
Popa M.
Nijkamp R.
62662
Popa M.
77331

Rose Marie Nijkamp defeated Maria Sara Popa 6-7 6-3 6-3 in the W35 Amstelveen round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nijkamp R.serving32% hold

wins 43% of points on serve vs Popa M.

Popa M.serving30% hold

wins 42% of points on serve vs Nijkamp R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nijkamp R.Popa M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
59%
2nd serve points won·Even
38%
41%
Service points won·Even
52%
53%
Return points won·Even
49%
47%
Break points saved·Even
48%
51%
Aces / match·Even
0.6
0.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
8.4
4.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nijkamp R.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Popa M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.4
Surface form
5.9
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nijkamp R.Popa M.
Freshness·
—
79

Popa M.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 44 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Hobgarski K.
Chirico L.
0-1
Semi-finals
Chirico L.
Schunk N.
2-66-46-4
Hobgarski K.
Van Emst S.
4-66-27-5
Quarter-finals
Chirico L.
Hennemann C.
6-46-2
Schunk N.
Naito Y.
6-16-1
Van Emst S.
Duerst J.
6-36-4
Hobgarski K.
Tran L.
6-23-66-2
R16
Chirico L.
Meliss V.
6-26-1
Naito Y.
Kazionova E.
7-666-4
Duerst J.
Vrancken Peeters A.
6-44-66-4
Hennemann C.
Smith T.
7-56-2
Schunk N.
Okutoyi A.
6-26-3
Van Emst S.
Soboleva A.
3-66-47-5
Hobgarski K.
Mikulskyte J.
3-67-627-5
R32
Van Den Broek I.
Strakhova V.
6-16-2
Chirico L.
Svendsen J.
6-16-3
Okutoyi A.
Geerlings A.
6-27-5
Hennemann C.
Kulambayeva Z.
7-56-1
Vrancken Peeters A.
Quevedo K.
3-67-646-1
Kazionova E.
Visscher S.
3-66-16-4
Duerst J.
Meyer Auf Der Heide L.
6-06-0
Smith T.
Ebeling Koning L.
2-67-56-3
Hobgarski K.
De Zeeuw J.
7-56-3
Soboleva A.
Van Zonneveld C.
6-06-4
Mikulskyte J.
Nijkamp R.
6-46-3
Naito Y.
Janicijevic S.
4-66-16-1
Schunk N.
Munk Mortensen R.
6-746-26-3
Van Emst S.
Diaz Adrover C.
6-46-2
Tran L.
Chiesa D.
6-32-66-2
Meliss V.
Shinikova I.
2-66-46-1
R64
Hennemann C.
Zaar L.
6-706-26-2
Chiesa D.
Hageman M.
3-67-56-2
Svendsen J.
Bubelyte K.
6-46-0
Naito Y.
Granwehr A.
7-616-0
Munk Mortensen R.
Hanatani N.
6-36-1
Meliss V.
Liu C.
4-67-666-3
Van Den Broek I.
Nagy A.
6-06-1
Van Zonneveld C.
Chiesa E.
4-66-26-3
Meyer Auf Der Heide L.
Fiquet T.
4-66-17-5
Van Emst S.
Hodzic M.
6-06-3
Nijkamp R.
Popa M.
6-726-36-3
Okutoyi A.
Bartashevich Y.
6-26-756-0
De Zeeuw J.
Schmidt L.
6-36-1
Ebeling Koning L.
Du Pree B.
6-13-66-3
Kazionova E.
Groen J.
1-66-36-3
Vrancken Peeters A.
Gimbrere J.
6-16-1