Max Houkes vs Federico Agustin Gomez — Modena CH Round of 32

Modena CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
NED
Max Houkes
#244ATP
1460ELO
1444Clay ELO
26 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 June 2025
clay
ARG8
Federico Agustin Gomez
#209ATP
1445ELO
1410Clay ELO
$29kYTD
$680kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLLLW
Houkes M.
6-4 6-3
Gomez F.
Houkes M.
662
Gomez F.
430

Max Houkes defeated Federico Agustin Gomez 6-4 6-3 in the Modena CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Federico Agustin Gomez came in ranked #209, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Max Houkes closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Houkes M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gomez F.

Gomez F.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Houkes M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Houkes M.Gomez F.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
5.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (67 vs 72). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Houkes M.Gomez F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
23
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
66
82
Break points won·Slight edge
29
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
34
62
Tiebreaks·Even
16
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Houkes M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Gomez F.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
6.0+34 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Clay Elo 1410
5.8Overall Elo 1460
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1445
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
4.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Houkes M.Gomez F.
Freshness·Dominant
89
59

Houkes M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Gomez F.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 111 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Travaglia S.
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Travaglia S.
Cina F.
1-66-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Kym J.
6-757-646-4
Quarter-finals
Cina F.
Cerundolo J.[3]
4-67-686-1
Travaglia S.
Pellegrino A.
6-46-726-2
Kym J.
Cecchinato M.
6-36-0
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Sakellaridis S.
6-36-757-64
R16
Sakellaridis S.
Echargui M.
3-66-36-4
Kym J.
Taberner C.[1]
6-23-67-63
Cina F.
Merida Aguilar D.
6-06-1
Travaglia S.
Tirante T.[6]
2-67-657-63
Cecchinato M.
Houkes M.
6-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Kodat T.
7-57-64
Cerundolo J.[3]
Diaz Acosta F.
7-616-3
Pellegrino A.
Galan D.[2]
6-27-62
R32
Taberner C.[1]
Geerts M.
6-47-5
Cecchinato M.
Monteiro T.
7-613-66-1
Houkes M.
Gomez F.[8]
6-46-3
Echargui M.
Boyer T.[5]
6-37-5
Cina F.
Poljicak M.
7-51-66-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Zahraj P.
6-16-4
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Alcala Gurri M.
6-16-2
Sakellaridis S.
Bondioli F.
6-47-65
Merida Aguilar D.
Burruchaga R.[7]
6-26-4
Kodat T.
Collarini A.
1-66-37-66
Kym J.
Parenti L.
6-26-4
Pellegrino A.
Thanos A.
6-46-4
Galan D.[2]
Arnaboldi F.
6-16-1
Tirante T.[6]
Buse I.
6-16-2
Cerundolo J.[3]
Dodig M.
6-36-2
Travaglia S.
Blancaneaux G.
7-646-4