Daniil Glinka vs William Manning — Cary CH Round of 32

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
EST
Daniil Glinka
#167ATP
1477ELO
1491Hard ELO
$127kYTD
$264kCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 June 2025
hard
USA
William Manning
21 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
L
Glinka D.
6-7 6-3 6-4
Manning W.
Glinka D.
65662
Manning W.
77341

Daniil Glinka defeated William Manning 6-7 6-3 6-4 in the Cary CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Glinka D.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Manning W.

Manning W.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Glinka D.

Serve advantage — Glinka D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Glinka D.Manning W.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
53%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
43%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
58%
Return points won·Clear edge
39%
25%
Break points saved·Clear edge
62%
40%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.3
7.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
5.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (77 vs 1). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Glinka D.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Manning W.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Glinka D.Manning W.
Freshness·
86
—

Glinka D.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Sakamoto R.
Draxl L.[2]
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Sakamoto R.
Kypson P.[8]
7-617-66
Draxl L.[2]
Wu Y.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Sakamoto R.
Schoolkate T.[1]
7-626-4
Kypson P.[8]
Galarneau A.[4]
5-76-36-4
Draxl L.[2]
Mayo A.
6-27-5
Wu Y.
Zheng M.
6-26-3
R16
Sakamoto R.
Maloney P.
3-66-16-2
Wu Y.
Bigun K.
7-56-2
Galarneau A.[4]
Martin A.
2-66-36-3
Draxl L.[2]
Sheehy J.
6-26-2
Kypson P.[8]
Sell K.
7-636-3
Zheng M.
Glinka D.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-13-66-2
Mayo A.
Moriya H.
6-46-4
R32
Sell K.
Nakagawa N.
6-17-5
Ilagan A.
Rybakov A.
7-57-5
Schoolkate T.[1]
Zhou Y.
7-656-746-1
Bigun K.
Tomic B.[9]
6-46-4
Zheng M.
Jasika O.[3]
6-26-2
Mayo A.
Andrade A.
6-16-3
Draxl L.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-26-2
Moriya H.
Noguchi R.[6]
7-52-66-3
Galarneau A.[4]
Roh H.
7-627-61
Martin A.
Dostanic S.
6-45-76-3
Maloney P.
Kirchheimer S.
6-23-67-66
Sheehy J.
Wu T.
7-56-2
Wu Y.
Mayew I.
6-36-3
Kypson P.[8]
Imamura M.
6-36-4
Glinka D.
Manning W.
6-756-36-4
Sakamoto R.
Mejia N.[7]
6-786-36-3