Carlos Taberner vs Michael Geerts — Modena CH Round of 32

Modena CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Carlos Taberner
ESP1
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 June 2025
clay
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1348Clay ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Taberner C.
6-4 7-5
Geerts M.
Taberner C.
672
Geerts M.
450

Carlos Taberner defeated Michael Geerts 6-4 7-5 in the Modena CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Taberner C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Taberner C.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.6
4.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (76 vs 75). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Taberner C.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
9
Break points saved·Slight edge
74
82
Break points won·Dominant
59
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
75
8
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Taberner C.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Geerts M.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.2+257 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.8Clay Elo 1348
7.5Overall Elo 1610
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1400
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.8
Surface form
4.4
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
4.5
Minutes 14d
8.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Travaglia S.
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Travaglia S.
Cina F.
1-66-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Kym J.
6-757-646-4
Quarter-finals
Cina F.
Cerundolo J.[3]
4-67-686-1
Travaglia S.
Pellegrino A.
6-46-726-2
Kym J.
Cecchinato M.
6-36-0
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Sakellaridis S.
6-36-757-64
R16
Sakellaridis S.
Echargui M.
3-66-36-4
Kym J.
Taberner C.[1]
6-23-67-63
Cina F.
Merida Aguilar D.
6-06-1
Travaglia S.
Tirante T.[6]
2-67-657-63
Cecchinato M.
Houkes M.
6-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Kodat T.
7-57-64
Cerundolo J.[3]
Diaz Acosta F.
7-616-3
Pellegrino A.
Galan D.[2]
6-27-62
R32
Taberner C.[1]
Geerts M.
6-47-5
Cecchinato M.
Monteiro T.
7-613-66-1
Houkes M.
Gomez F.[8]
6-46-3
Echargui M.
Boyer T.[5]
6-37-5
Cina F.
Poljicak M.
7-51-66-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Zahraj P.
6-16-4
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Alcala Gurri M.
6-16-2
Sakellaridis S.
Bondioli F.
6-47-65
Merida Aguilar D.
Burruchaga R.[7]
6-26-4
Kodat T.
Collarini A.
1-66-37-66
Kym J.
Parenti L.
6-26-4
Pellegrino A.
Thanos A.
6-46-4
Galan D.[2]
Arnaboldi F.
6-16-1
Tirante T.[6]
Buse I.
6-16-2
Cerundolo J.[3]
Dodig M.
6-36-2
Travaglia S.
Blancaneaux G.
7-646-4