Liam Draxl vs Joshua Sheehy — Cary CH Round of 16

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Liam Draxl
CAN2
Liam Draxl
#223ATP
1592ELO
1565Hard ELO
$201kYTD
$642kCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 June 2025
hard
USA
Joshua Sheehy
#665ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLLL
Draxl L.
6-2 6-2
Sheehy J.
Draxl L.
662
Sheehy J.
220

Liam Draxl defeated Joshua Sheehy 6-2 6-2 in the Cary CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Draxl L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Sheehy J.

Sheehy J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Draxl L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Draxl L.Sheehy J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
7.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 45). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draxl L.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 28 days (−0.3)
Sheehy J.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
1.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draxl L.Sheehy J.
Freshness·Slight edge
98
89

Draxl L.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Sheehy J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Sakamoto R.
Draxl L.[2]
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Sakamoto R.
Kypson P.[8]
7-617-66
Draxl L.[2]
Wu Y.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Sakamoto R.
Schoolkate T.[1]
7-626-4
Kypson P.[8]
Galarneau A.[4]
5-76-36-4
Draxl L.[2]
Mayo A.
6-27-5
Wu Y.
Zheng M.
6-26-3
R16
Sakamoto R.
Maloney P.
3-66-16-2
Wu Y.
Bigun K.
7-56-2
Galarneau A.[4]
Martin A.
2-66-36-3
Draxl L.[2]
Sheehy J.
6-26-2
Kypson P.[8]
Sell K.
7-636-3
Zheng M.
Glinka D.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-13-66-2
Mayo A.
Moriya H.
6-46-4
R32
Sell K.
Nakagawa N.
6-17-5
Ilagan A.
Rybakov A.
7-57-5
Schoolkate T.[1]
Zhou Y.
7-656-746-1
Bigun K.
Tomic B.[9]
6-46-4
Zheng M.
Jasika O.[3]
6-26-2
Mayo A.
Andrade A.
6-16-3
Draxl L.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-26-2
Moriya H.
Noguchi R.[6]
7-52-66-3
Galarneau A.[4]
Roh H.
7-627-61
Martin A.
Dostanic S.
6-45-76-3
Maloney P.
Kirchheimer S.
6-23-67-66
Sheehy J.
Wu T.
7-56-2
Wu Y.
Mayew I.
6-36-3
Kypson P.[8]
Imamura M.
6-36-4
Glinka D.
Manning W.
6-756-36-4
Sakamoto R.
Mejia N.[7]
6-786-36-3