Liam Draxl vs Philip Sekulic — Cary CH Round of 32

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Liam Draxl
CAN2
Liam Draxl
#223ATP
1592ELO
1565Hard ELO
$201kYTD
$642kCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 June 2025
hard
AUS
Philip Sekulic
#317ATP
1390ELO
1363Hard ELO
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
Draxl L.
6-2 6-2
Sekulic P.
Draxl L.
662
Sekulic P.
220

Liam Draxl defeated Philip Sekulic 6-2 6-2 in the Cary CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Draxl L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Sekulic P.

Sekulic P.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Draxl L.

Serve advantage — Draxl L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Draxl L.Sekulic P.
1st serve in·Even
66%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Even
4.1
4.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 42). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draxl L.Sekulic P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
27
Break points saved·Even
83
79
Break points won·Dominant
36
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
45
Tiebreaks·Dominant
75
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draxl L.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 28 days (−0.3)
Sekulic P.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 217 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
8.1+202 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Hard Elo 1363
8.1Overall Elo 1592
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1390
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
7.5
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draxl L.Sekulic P.
Freshness·Slight edge
98
92

Draxl L.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Sekulic P.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Sakamoto R.
Draxl L.[2]
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Sakamoto R.
Kypson P.[8]
7-617-66
Draxl L.[2]
Wu Y.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Sakamoto R.
Schoolkate T.[1]
7-626-4
Kypson P.[8]
Galarneau A.[4]
5-76-36-4
Draxl L.[2]
Mayo A.
6-27-5
Wu Y.
Zheng M.
6-26-3
R16
Sakamoto R.
Maloney P.
3-66-16-2
Wu Y.
Bigun K.
7-56-2
Galarneau A.[4]
Martin A.
2-66-36-3
Draxl L.[2]
Sheehy J.
6-26-2
Kypson P.[8]
Sell K.
7-636-3
Zheng M.
Glinka D.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-13-66-2
Mayo A.
Moriya H.
6-46-4
R32
Sell K.
Nakagawa N.
6-17-5
Ilagan A.
Rybakov A.
7-57-5
Schoolkate T.[1]
Zhou Y.
7-656-746-1
Bigun K.
Tomic B.[9]
6-46-4
Zheng M.
Jasika O.[3]
6-26-2
Mayo A.
Andrade A.
6-16-3
Draxl L.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-26-2
Moriya H.
Noguchi R.[6]
7-52-66-3
Galarneau A.[4]
Roh H.
7-627-61
Martin A.
Dostanic S.
6-45-76-3
Maloney P.
Kirchheimer S.
6-23-67-66
Sheehy J.
Wu T.
7-56-2
Wu Y.
Mayew I.
6-36-3
Kypson P.[8]
Imamura M.
6-36-4
Glinka D.
Manning W.
6-756-36-4
Sakamoto R.
Mejia N.[7]
6-786-36-3