Facundo Diaz Acosta vs Patrick Zahraj — Modena CH Round of 32

Modena CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Facundo Diaz Acosta
ARG
Facundo Diaz Acosta
#110ATP
1681ELO
1668Clay ELO
$264kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 June 2025
clay
GER
Patrick Zahraj
#425ATP
1331ELO
1259Clay ELO
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Diaz Acosta F.
6-1 6-4
Zahraj P.
Diaz Acosta F.
662
Zahraj P.
140

Facundo Diaz Acosta defeated Patrick Zahraj 6-1 6-4 in the Modena CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Facundo Diaz Acosta came in ranked #110.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Diaz Acosta F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Zahraj P.

Zahraj P.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Diaz Acosta F.

Serve advantage — Diaz Acosta F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Diaz Acosta F.Zahraj P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
45%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
5.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.7
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (74 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Diaz Acosta F.Zahraj P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
20
Break points saved·Clear edge
89
69
Break points won·Clear edge
33
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
67
7
Tiebreaks·Even
81
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Diaz Acosta F.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 126 days (−1.5)
Zahraj P.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
8.8+410 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.2Clay Elo 1259
7.6Overall Elo 1681
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1331
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
1.9
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.2
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Diaz Acosta F.Zahraj P.
Freshness·Dominant
53
80

Diaz Acosta F.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d) · Zahraj P.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 53 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Travaglia S.
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Travaglia S.
Cina F.
1-66-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Kym J.
6-757-646-4
Quarter-finals
Cina F.
Cerundolo J.[3]
4-67-686-1
Travaglia S.
Pellegrino A.
6-46-726-2
Kym J.
Cecchinato M.
6-36-0
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Sakellaridis S.
6-36-757-64
R16
Sakellaridis S.
Echargui M.
3-66-36-4
Kym J.
Taberner C.[1]
6-23-67-63
Cina F.
Merida Aguilar D.
6-06-1
Travaglia S.
Tirante T.[6]
2-67-657-63
Cecchinato M.
Houkes M.
6-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Kodat T.
7-57-64
Cerundolo J.[3]
Diaz Acosta F.
7-616-3
Pellegrino A.
Galan D.[2]
6-27-62
R32
Taberner C.[1]
Geerts M.
6-47-5
Cecchinato M.
Monteiro T.
7-613-66-1
Houkes M.
Gomez F.[8]
6-46-3
Echargui M.
Boyer T.[5]
6-37-5
Cina F.
Poljicak M.
7-51-66-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Zahraj P.
6-16-4
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Alcala Gurri M.
6-16-2
Sakellaridis S.
Bondioli F.
6-47-65
Merida Aguilar D.
Burruchaga R.[7]
6-26-4
Kodat T.
Collarini A.
1-66-37-66
Kym J.
Parenti L.
6-26-4
Pellegrino A.
Thanos A.
6-46-4
Galan D.[2]
Arnaboldi F.
6-16-1
Tirante T.[6]
Buse I.
6-16-2
Cerundolo J.[3]
Dodig M.
6-36-2
Travaglia S.
Blancaneaux G.
7-646-4