Christoph Negritu vs Ivan Gakhov — Milan CH Round of 16

Milan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Christoph Negritu
GER
Christoph Negritu
#519ATP
1459ELO
1429Clay ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 June 2025
clay
Ivan Gakhov
RUS8
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
Negritu C.
6-3 6-4
Gakhov I.
Negritu C.
662
Gakhov I.
340

Christoph Negritu defeated Ivan Gakhov 6-3 6-4 in the Milan CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Ivan Gakhov came in ranked #388, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Negritu C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Gakhov I.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Negritu C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Negritu C.Gakhov I.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.9
4.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.4
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Negritu C.Gakhov I.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
16
34
Break points saved·Even
78
82
Break points won·Slight edge
0
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
26
59
Tiebreaks·Even
21
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Negritu C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Gakhov I.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.6+44 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.4Clay Elo 1384
5.4Overall Elo 1459
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1430
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
5.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
6.2
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cecchinato M.
Prizmic D.[1]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Prizmic D.[1]
Jodar R.
3-66-36-2
Cecchinato M.
Vasami J.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Vasami J.
Mikrut L.
3-67-646-2
Prizmic D.[1]
Negritu C.
6-46-3
Cecchinato M.
Houkes M.[3]
6-46-2
Jodar R.
Gea A.
6-02-66-3
R16
Gea A.
Roca Batalla O.
6-41-66-3
Negritu C.
Gakhov I.[8]
6-36-4
Houkes M.[3]
Faurel T.
2-66-06-2
Vasami J.
Poljicak M.[7]
3-66-17-5
Mikrut L.
Prihodko O.
6-36-1
Prizmic D.[1]
Berrettini J.
6-16-2
Jodar R.
Pereira T.
4-67-56-1
Cecchinato M.
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
6-36-0
R32
Berrettini J.
Squire H.
7-650-0
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
Vatutin A.
6-31-1
Negritu C.
Erhard M.
2-67-676-4
Mikrut L.
Coppejans K.[2]
6-46-4
Pereira T.
Soto M.[4]
6-34-66-3
Gea A.
Dedura Palomero D.
7-646-1
Houkes M.[3]
Fonio G.
3-66-37-65
Cecchinato M.
Alcala Gurri M.
6-46-1
Faurel T.
Bondioli F.
6-32-66-2
Gakhov I.[8]
Martin A.
3-66-17-63
Poljicak M.[7]
Travaglia S.
6-25-76-2
Jodar R.
Giustino L.
6-06-2
Prihodko O.
Albot R.
6-36-4
Vasami J.
Santamarta Roig A.
6-37-5
Roca Batalla O.
Pacheco Mendez R.[5]
4-66-46-1
Prizmic D.[1]
Piraino G.
6-16-4