Ivan Gakhov vs Andrej Martin — Milan CH Round of 32

Milan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ivan Gakhov
RUS8
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 June 2025
clay
SVK
Andrej Martin
#392ATP
1470ELO
1444Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWWL
Gakhov I.
3-6 6-1 7-6
Martin A.
Gakhov I.
36772
Martin A.
61631

Ivan Gakhov defeated Andrej Martin 3-6 6-1 7-6 in the Milan CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Ivan Gakhov came in ranked #388, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Martin A.

Martin A.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Serve advantage — Martin A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Martin A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 46). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Martin A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
34
12
Break points saved·Dominant
82
54
Break points won·Clear edge
9
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
59
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Martin A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.2Clay Elo 1384
Surface ELO
5.8+60 Clay Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1430
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1470
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
4.2
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
7.8
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cecchinato M.
Prizmic D.[1]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Prizmic D.[1]
Jodar R.
3-66-36-2
Cecchinato M.
Vasami J.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Vasami J.
Mikrut L.
3-67-646-2
Prizmic D.[1]
Negritu C.
6-46-3
Cecchinato M.
Houkes M.[3]
6-46-2
Jodar R.
Gea A.
6-02-66-3
R16
Gea A.
Roca Batalla O.
6-41-66-3
Negritu C.
Gakhov I.[8]
6-36-4
Houkes M.[3]
Faurel T.
2-66-06-2
Vasami J.
Poljicak M.[7]
3-66-17-5
Mikrut L.
Prihodko O.
6-36-1
Prizmic D.[1]
Berrettini J.
6-16-2
Jodar R.
Pereira T.
4-67-56-1
Cecchinato M.
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
6-36-0
R32
Berrettini J.
Squire H.
7-650-0
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
Vatutin A.
6-31-1
Negritu C.
Erhard M.
2-67-676-4
Mikrut L.
Coppejans K.[2]
6-46-4
Pereira T.
Soto M.[4]
6-34-66-3
Gea A.
Dedura Palomero D.
7-646-1
Houkes M.[3]
Fonio G.
3-66-37-65
Cecchinato M.
Alcala Gurri M.
6-46-1
Faurel T.
Bondioli F.
6-32-66-2
Gakhov I.[8]
Martin A.
3-66-17-63
Poljicak M.[7]
Travaglia S.
6-25-76-2
Jodar R.
Giustino L.
6-06-2
Prihodko O.
Albot R.
6-36-4
Vasami J.
Santamarta Roig A.
6-37-5
Roca Batalla O.
Pacheco Mendez R.[5]
4-66-46-1
Prizmic D.[1]
Piraino G.
6-16-4