Dino Prizmic vs Jacopo Berrettini — Milan CH Round of 16

Milan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Dino Prizmic
CRO1
Dino Prizmic
#84ATP
1841ELO
1803Clay ELO
$530kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
20 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 June 2025
clay
ITA
Jacopo Berrettini
#546ATP
1325ELO
1336Clay ELO
27 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Prizmic D.
6-1 6-2
Berrettini J.
Prizmic D.
662
Berrettini J.
120

Dino Prizmic defeated Jacopo Berrettini 6-1 6-2 in the Milan CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Dino Prizmic came in ranked #84.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Prizmic D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Berrettini J.

Berrettini J.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Prizmic D.

Serve advantage — Prizmic D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Prizmic D.Berrettini J.
44
Serve
—
51
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Prizmic D.Berrettini J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (83 vs 43). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Prizmic D.Berrettini J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
2
Break points saved·Dominant
92
23
Break points won·Dominant
64
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
21
Tiebreaks·Even
37
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Prizmic D.
8.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Berrettini J.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+467 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Clay Elo 1336
10.0Overall Elo 1841
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1325
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.5
Surface form
2.5
10.011-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
5.4
Minutes 14d
8.5
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Prizmic D.Berrettini J.
Freshness·
87
—

Prizmic D.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cecchinato M.
Prizmic D.[1]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Prizmic D.[1]
Jodar R.
3-66-36-2
Cecchinato M.
Vasami J.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Vasami J.
Mikrut L.
3-67-646-2
Prizmic D.[1]
Negritu C.
6-46-3
Cecchinato M.
Houkes M.[3]
6-46-2
Jodar R.
Gea A.
6-02-66-3
R16
Gea A.
Roca Batalla O.
6-41-66-3
Negritu C.
Gakhov I.[8]
6-36-4
Houkes M.[3]
Faurel T.
2-66-06-2
Vasami J.
Poljicak M.[7]
3-66-17-5
Mikrut L.
Prihodko O.
6-36-1
Prizmic D.[1]
Berrettini J.
6-16-2
Jodar R.
Pereira T.
4-67-56-1
Cecchinato M.
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
6-36-0
R32
Berrettini J.
Squire H.
7-650-0
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
Vatutin A.
6-31-1
Negritu C.
Erhard M.
2-67-676-4
Mikrut L.
Coppejans K.[2]
6-46-4
Pereira T.
Soto M.[4]
6-34-66-3
Gea A.
Dedura Palomero D.
7-646-1
Houkes M.[3]
Fonio G.
3-66-37-65
Cecchinato M.
Alcala Gurri M.
6-46-1
Faurel T.
Bondioli F.
6-32-66-2
Gakhov I.[8]
Martin A.
3-66-17-63
Poljicak M.[7]
Travaglia S.
6-25-76-2
Jodar R.
Giustino L.
6-06-2
Prihodko O.
Albot R.
6-36-4
Vasami J.
Santamarta Roig A.
6-37-5
Roca Batalla O.
Pacheco Mendez R.[5]
4-66-46-1
Prizmic D.[1]
Piraino G.
6-16-4