Tomas Barrios Vera vs James Trotter — Nottingham 2 CH Round of 32

Nottingham 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tomas Barrios Vera
CHI6
Tomas Barrios Vera
#139ATP
1615ELO
1563Grass ELO
$205kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 June 2025
grass
JPN
James Trotter
#432ATP
1414ELO
1385Grass ELO
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLLWLW
Barrios Vera T.
6-3 6-4
Trotter J.
Barrios Vera T.
662
Trotter J.
340

Tomas Barrios Vera defeated James Trotter 6-3 6-4 in the Nottingham 2 CH round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Tomas Barrios Vera came in ranked #139.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Barrios Vera T.serving88% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Trotter J.

Trotter J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Barrios Vera T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Barrios Vera T.Trotter J.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
34%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.5
8.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (111 vs 66). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Barrios Vera T.Trotter J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
40
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
90
Break points won·Dominant
43
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
52
81
Tiebreaks·Dominant
90
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Barrios Vera T.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Trotter J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
7.4+178 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Grass Elo 1385
7.5Overall Elo 1615
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1414
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
7.9
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Barrios Vera T.Trotter J.
Freshness·Dominant
90
61

Barrios Vera T.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 35 games (7d) · Trotter J.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Mochizuki S.
Smith C.
6-26-2
Cilic M.[2]
Landaluce M.
6-766-47-67
Quarter-finals
Mochizuki S.
Faria J.
6-26-0
Cilic M.[2]
Barrios Vera T.[6]
6-16-3
Landaluce M.
Atmane T.
6-736-26-3
Smith C.
Nava E.
6-756-46-4
R16
Cilic M.[2]
Harris L.
2-66-43-1
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Schoolkate T.
6-27-68
Landaluce M.
Mannarino A.
4-67-57-5
Atmane T.
Fery A.
5-76-36-4
Faria J.
Choinski J.
7-56-3
Smith C.
Mccabe J.
5-76-36-3
Mochizuki S.
Boyer T.[8]
6-26-3
Nava E.
Peniston R.
7-656-4
R32
Atmane T.
Gigante M.
4-66-46-4
Mochizuki S.
Herbert P.
6-47-67
Peniston R.
Galan D.[5]
5-76-46-2
Mccabe J.
Loffhagen G.
6-37-64
Smith C.
Trungelliti M.
6-24-66-3
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Trotter J.
6-36-4
Harris L.
Royer V.
7-666-2
Cilic M.[2]
Grenier H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-36-7106-3
Landaluce M.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-22-66-2
Schoolkate T.
Blockx A.
6-36-2
Boyer T.[8]
Krueger M.
6-17-5
Choinski J.
Spizzirri E.
5-76-46-4
Faria J.
Holt B.[3]
6-36-4
Fery A.
Fognini F.
6-37-65
Mannarino A.
Cazaux A.[7]
6-46-3