Colton Smith vs James Mccabe — Nottingham 2 CH Round of 16

Nottingham 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Colton Smith
#181ATP
1577ELO
1543Grass ELO
$154kYTD
$480kCAREER
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 June 2025
grass
AUS
James Mccabe
#242ATP
1532ELO
1537Grass ELO
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
Smith C.
5-7 6-3 6-3
Mccabe J.
Smith C.
5662
Mccabe J.
7331

Colton Smith defeated James Mccabe 5-7 6-3 6-3 in the Nottingham 2 CH round of 16 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Smith C.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Mccabe J.

Mccabe J.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Smith C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Smith C.Mccabe J.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.1
8.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (80 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Smith C.Mccabe J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
62
37
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
85
Break points won·Dominant
52
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
92
71
Tiebreaks·Even
8
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Smith C.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Mccabe J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2+6 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Grass Elo 1537
4.8Overall Elo 1577
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1532
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
2.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
3.9
Minutes 14d
7.1
0.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Smith C.Mccabe J.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
95

Smith C.: 19 days rest · Mccabe J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Mochizuki S.
Smith C.
6-26-2
Cilic M.[2]
Landaluce M.
6-766-47-67
Quarter-finals
Mochizuki S.
Faria J.
6-26-0
Cilic M.[2]
Barrios Vera T.[6]
6-16-3
Landaluce M.
Atmane T.
6-736-26-3
Smith C.
Nava E.
6-756-46-4
R16
Cilic M.[2]
Harris L.
2-66-43-1
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Schoolkate T.
6-27-68
Landaluce M.
Mannarino A.
4-67-57-5
Atmane T.
Fery A.
5-76-36-4
Faria J.
Choinski J.
7-56-3
Smith C.
Mccabe J.
5-76-36-3
Mochizuki S.
Boyer T.[8]
6-26-3
Nava E.
Peniston R.
7-656-4
R32
Atmane T.
Gigante M.
4-66-46-4
Mochizuki S.
Herbert P.
6-47-67
Peniston R.
Galan D.[5]
5-76-46-2
Mccabe J.
Loffhagen G.
6-37-64
Smith C.
Trungelliti M.
6-24-66-3
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Trotter J.
6-36-4
Harris L.
Royer V.
7-666-2
Cilic M.[2]
Grenier H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-36-7106-3
Landaluce M.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-22-66-2
Schoolkate T.
Blockx A.
6-36-2
Boyer T.[8]
Krueger M.
6-17-5
Choinski J.
Spizzirri E.
5-76-46-4
Faria J.
Holt B.[3]
6-36-4
Fery A.
Fognini F.
6-37-65
Mannarino A.
Cazaux A.[7]
6-46-3