Martin Landaluce vs Adrian Mannarino — Nottingham 2 CH Round of 16

Nottingham 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Martin Landaluce
ESP
Martin Landaluce
1727ELO
1635Grass ELO
$742kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
20 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 June 2025
grass
Adrian Mannarino
FRA
Adrian Mannarino
#49ATP
1673ELO
1653Grass ELO
$633kYTD
$15MCAREER
38 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLWW
Landaluce M.
4-6 7-5 7-5
Mannarino A.
Landaluce M.
4772
Mannarino A.
6551

Martin Landaluce defeated Adrian Mannarino 4-6 7-5 7-5 in the Nottingham 2 CH round of 16 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Landaluce M.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Mannarino A.

Mannarino A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Landaluce M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Landaluce M.Mannarino A.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Even
4.1
4.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.5
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (96 vs 93). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Landaluce M.Mannarino A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
65
Break points saved·Even
92
96
Break points won·Dominant
17
66
Deciding sets·Clear edge
89
72
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
58
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Landaluce M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Mannarino A.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.9Grass Elo 1635
Surface ELO
5.1+18 Grass Elo edge
5.4Overall Elo 1727
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1673
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
4.2
Fatigue & Travel
5.0
Minutes 14d
3.5
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Landaluce M.Mannarino A.
Freshness·Clear edge
98
77

Landaluce M.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Mannarino A.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 46 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Mochizuki S.
Smith C.
6-26-2
Cilic M.[2]
Landaluce M.
6-766-47-67
Quarter-finals
Mochizuki S.
Faria J.
6-26-0
Cilic M.[2]
Barrios Vera T.[6]
6-16-3
Landaluce M.
Atmane T.
6-736-26-3
Smith C.
Nava E.
6-756-46-4
R16
Cilic M.[2]
Harris L.
2-66-43-1
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Schoolkate T.
6-27-68
Landaluce M.
Mannarino A.
4-67-57-5
Atmane T.
Fery A.
5-76-36-4
Faria J.
Choinski J.
7-56-3
Smith C.
Mccabe J.
5-76-36-3
Mochizuki S.
Boyer T.[8]
6-26-3
Nava E.
Peniston R.
7-656-4
R32
Atmane T.
Gigante M.
4-66-46-4
Mochizuki S.
Herbert P.
6-47-67
Peniston R.
Galan D.[5]
5-76-46-2
Mccabe J.
Loffhagen G.
6-37-64
Smith C.
Trungelliti M.
6-24-66-3
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Trotter J.
6-36-4
Harris L.
Royer V.
7-666-2
Cilic M.[2]
Grenier H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-36-7106-3
Landaluce M.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-22-66-2
Schoolkate T.
Blockx A.
6-36-2
Boyer T.[8]
Krueger M.
6-17-5
Choinski J.
Spizzirri E.
5-76-46-4
Faria J.
Holt B.[3]
6-36-4
Fery A.
Fognini F.
6-37-65
Mannarino A.
Cazaux A.[7]
6-46-3