Yeon Woo Ku vs Rina Saigo — W35 Taipei Final

W35 Taipei · CHALLENGER · Final
KOR
Yeon Woo Ku
1519ELO
1500Hard ELO
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 June 2025
hard
JPN
Rina Saigo
#313WTA
1307ELO
1293Hard ELO
25 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLLW
Ku Y.
6-1 6-4
Saigo R.
Ku Y.
662
Saigo R.
14–

Yeon Woo Ku defeated Rina Saigo 6-1 6-4 in the W35 Taipei final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ku Y.serving44% hold

wins 48% of points on serve vs Saigo R.

Saigo R.serving35% hold

wins 44% of points on serve vs Ku Y.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ku Y.Saigo R.
1st serve in·Even
67%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
57%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
56%
53%
Return points won·Even
49%
48%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Even
1.1
0.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (89 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ku Y.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Saigo R.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+208 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Hard Elo 1293
6.8Overall Elo 1519
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1307
7.2No prior meetings
H2H
2.8
6.0
Surface form
5.6
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ku Y.Saigo R.
Freshness·
100
—

Ku Y.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Ku Y.
Saigo R.
6-16-4
Tjen J.
Kobori M.
4-66-16-2
Semi-finals
Saigo R.
Matsuda M.
7-636-2
Ku Y.
Back D.
7-646-1
Tjen J.
Park S.
6-46-4
Kobori M.
Shimizu E.
6-756-16-1
Quarter-finals
Back D.
Lin F.
6-736-16-2
Matsuda M.
Shimizu E.
6-46-4
Saigo R.
Yang V.
6-46-1
Ku Y.
Shimizu A.
6-06-2
Park S.
Saigo R.
6-36-0
Tjen J.
Kawaguchi N.
6-16-0
Shimizu E.
Hosogi S.
6-26-1
Kobori M.
Shimizu A.
6-33-66-4
R16
Lin F.
Lee E.
7-654-66-3
Shimizu A.
Kuramochi M.
5-77-631-0
Shimizu E.
Muramatsu C.
6-30-66-3
Saigo R.
Kitahara Y.
6-26-0
Matsuda M.
Hosogi S.
6-26-0
Yang V.
Park S.
3-67-56-2
Ku Y.
Chaudhari V.
6-36-1
Back D.
Morvayova V.
4-66-07-5
Tjen J.
Ku Y.
3-66-17-60
Park S.
Yang Y.
6-06-1
Saigo R.
Lee C.
1-66-36-4
Kawaguchi N.
Akita S.
6-36-4
Shimizu E.
Kummel A.
6-27-5
Kobori M.
Chaudhari V.
7-55-76-3
Hosogi S.
Kim D.
6-46-3
Shimizu A.
Muramatsu C.
1-66-26-0
R32
Lin F.
Barry M.
6-46-3
Hosogi S.
Lin Y.
6-25-77-66
Kitahara Y.
Nepliy E.
6-736-46-2
Chaudhari V.
Namigata J.
7-56-0
Lee E.
Korhonen C.
6-36-3
Yang V.
Aikawa M.
7-57-62
Kuramochi M.
Defalco J.
4-66-16-0
Saigo R.
Shek C.
6-26-1
Shimizu A.
Tsai Y.
6-36-1
Park S.
Yang Y.
6-37-64
Shimizu E.
Kawaguchi N.
6-26-2
Muramatsu C.
Rioux L.
3-66-46-4
Matsuda M.
Leong S.
6-26-4
Ku Y.
Jessup M.
6-06-0
Back D.
Arakawa H.
6-26-2
Morvayova V.
Varaksina A.
7-56-3
Kummel A.
Yamazaki I.
6-36-4
Chaudhari V.
Rioux L.
6-36-4
Shimizu E.
Back D.
6-16-2
Muramatsu C.
Lin F.
6-36-4
Kawaguchi N.
Lee E.
6-26-2
Kobori M.
Kitahara Y.
6-16-3
Park S.
Imamura S.
6-46-4
Kim D.
Li Y.
6-43-66-2
Yang Y.
Lin Y.
6-26-1
Hosogi S.
Tsai Y.
6-06-4
Lee C.
Defalco J.
3-67-616-3
Akita S.
Kuramochi M.
7-655-76-1
Ku Y.
Matsuda M.
6-36-3
Shimizu A.
Aikawa M.
6-46-0
Tjen J.
Lansere S.
7-6156-0
Saigo R.
Nepliy E.
7-667-5