Lloyd Harris vs Valentin Royer — Nottingham 2 CH Round of 32

Nottingham 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Lloyd Harris
RSA
Lloyd Harris
#187ATP
1665ELO
1608Grass ELO
$130kYTD
$4.7MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 June 2025
grass
Valentin Royer
FRA
Valentin Royer
#77ATP
1641ELO
1573Grass ELO
$521kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWL
Harris L.
7-6 6-2
Royer V.
Harris L.
7862
Royer V.
6620

Lloyd Harris defeated Valentin Royer 7-6 6-2 in the Nottingham 2 CH round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Valentin Royer came in ranked #77.

Key context

  • Match story: Lloyd Harris closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Harris L.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Royer V.

Royer V.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Harris L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Harris L.Royer V.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.4
5.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (59 vs 116). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Harris L.Royer V.
Clutch Rating·Even
57
59
Break points saved·Even
95
94
Break points won·Slight edge
24
30
Deciding sets·Clear edge
94
76
Tiebreaks·Dominant
24
62

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Harris L.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Royer V.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.3+35 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.7Grass Elo 1573
5.1Overall Elo 1665
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1641
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
0.0
4.0
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Harris L.Royer V.
Freshness·
—
57

Royer V.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 94 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Mochizuki S.
Smith C.
6-26-2
Cilic M.[2]
Landaluce M.
6-766-47-67
Quarter-finals
Mochizuki S.
Faria J.
6-26-0
Cilic M.[2]
Barrios Vera T.[6]
6-16-3
Landaluce M.
Atmane T.
6-736-26-3
Smith C.
Nava E.
6-756-46-4
R16
Cilic M.[2]
Harris L.
2-66-43-1
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Schoolkate T.
6-27-68
Landaluce M.
Mannarino A.
4-67-57-5
Atmane T.
Fery A.
5-76-36-4
Faria J.
Choinski J.
7-56-3
Smith C.
Mccabe J.
5-76-36-3
Mochizuki S.
Boyer T.[8]
6-26-3
Nava E.
Peniston R.
7-656-4
R32
Atmane T.
Gigante M.
4-66-46-4
Mochizuki S.
Herbert P.
6-47-67
Peniston R.
Galan D.[5]
5-76-46-2
Mccabe J.
Loffhagen G.
6-37-64
Smith C.
Trungelliti M.
6-24-66-3
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Trotter J.
6-36-4
Harris L.
Royer V.
7-666-2
Cilic M.[2]
Grenier H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-36-7106-3
Landaluce M.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-22-66-2
Schoolkate T.
Blockx A.
6-36-2
Boyer T.[8]
Krueger M.
6-17-5
Choinski J.
Spizzirri E.
5-76-46-4
Faria J.
Holt B.[3]
6-36-4
Fery A.
Fognini F.
6-37-65
Mannarino A.
Cazaux A.[7]
6-46-3