Jaime Faria vs Brandon Holt — Nottingham 2 CH Round of 32

Nottingham 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
POR
Jaime Faria
#92ATP
1735ELO
1624Grass ELO
$531kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 June 2025
grass
USA3
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Grass ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Faria J.
6-3 6-4
Holt B.
Faria J.
662
Holt B.
340

Jaime Faria defeated Brandon Holt 6-3 6-4 in the Nottingham 2 CH round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Jaime Faria came in ranked #92.

Key context

  • Match story: Jaime Faria closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Faria J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Faria J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Faria J.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.4
5.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.7
0.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (91 vs 75). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Faria J.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Even
54
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
76
85
Break points won·Slight edge
22
31
Deciding sets·Even
81
79
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
76
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Faria J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Holt B.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1+117 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Grass Elo 1507
6.7Overall Elo 1735
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1537
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
5.2
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Faria J.Holt B.
Freshness·
91
—

Faria J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Mochizuki S.
Smith C.
6-26-2
Cilic M.[2]
Landaluce M.
6-766-47-67
Quarter-finals
Mochizuki S.
Faria J.
6-26-0
Cilic M.[2]
Barrios Vera T.[6]
6-16-3
Landaluce M.
Atmane T.
6-736-26-3
Smith C.
Nava E.
6-756-46-4
R16
Cilic M.[2]
Harris L.
2-66-43-1
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Schoolkate T.
6-27-68
Landaluce M.
Mannarino A.
4-67-57-5
Atmane T.
Fery A.
5-76-36-4
Faria J.
Choinski J.
7-56-3
Smith C.
Mccabe J.
5-76-36-3
Mochizuki S.
Boyer T.[8]
6-26-3
Nava E.
Peniston R.
7-656-4
R32
Atmane T.
Gigante M.
4-66-46-4
Mochizuki S.
Herbert P.
6-47-67
Peniston R.
Galan D.[5]
5-76-46-2
Mccabe J.
Loffhagen G.
6-37-64
Smith C.
Trungelliti M.
6-24-66-3
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Trotter J.
6-36-4
Harris L.
Royer V.
7-666-2
Cilic M.[2]
Grenier H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-36-7106-3
Landaluce M.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-22-66-2
Schoolkate T.
Blockx A.
6-36-2
Boyer T.[8]
Krueger M.
6-17-5
Choinski J.
Spizzirri E.
5-76-46-4
Faria J.
Holt B.[3]
6-36-4
Fery A.
Fognini F.
6-37-65
Mannarino A.
Cazaux A.[7]
6-46-3