Marin Cilic vs Tomas Barrios Vera — Nottingham 2 CH Quarter-final

Nottingham 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Marin Cilic
CRO2
Marin Cilic
#88ATP
1800ELO
1756Grass ELO
$776kYTD
$33MCAREER
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 June 2025
grass
Tomas Barrios Vera
CHI6
Tomas Barrios Vera
#139ATP
1615ELO
1563Grass ELO
$205kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Cilic M.
6-1 6-3
Barrios Vera T.
Cilic M.
662
Barrios Vera T.
130

Marin Cilic defeated Tomas Barrios Vera 6-1 6-3 in the Nottingham 2 CH quarter-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Marin Cilic came in ranked #88.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cilic M.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Barrios Vera T.

Barrios Vera T.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Cilic M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cilic M.Barrios Vera T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
65%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
78%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.2
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (64 vs 111). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cilic M.Barrios Vera T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
76
56
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
85
Break points won·Even
41
43
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
52
Tiebreaks·Even
87
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cilic M.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Barrios Vera T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+194 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Grass Elo 1563
7.5Overall Elo 1800
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1615
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
6.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
8.3
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cilic M.Barrios Vera T.
Freshness·Slight edge
98
88

Cilic M.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Barrios Vera T.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 35 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Mochizuki S.
Smith C.
6-26-2
Cilic M.[2]
Landaluce M.
6-766-47-67
Quarter-finals
Mochizuki S.
Faria J.
6-26-0
Cilic M.[2]
Barrios Vera T.[6]
6-16-3
Landaluce M.
Atmane T.
6-736-26-3
Smith C.
Nava E.
6-756-46-4
R16
Cilic M.[2]
Harris L.
2-66-43-1
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Schoolkate T.
6-27-68
Landaluce M.
Mannarino A.
4-67-57-5
Atmane T.
Fery A.
5-76-36-4
Faria J.
Choinski J.
7-56-3
Smith C.
Mccabe J.
5-76-36-3
Mochizuki S.
Boyer T.[8]
6-26-3
Nava E.
Peniston R.
7-656-4
R32
Atmane T.
Gigante M.
4-66-46-4
Mochizuki S.
Herbert P.
6-47-67
Peniston R.
Galan D.[5]
5-76-46-2
Mccabe J.
Loffhagen G.
6-37-64
Smith C.
Trungelliti M.
6-24-66-3
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Trotter J.
6-36-4
Harris L.
Royer V.
7-666-2
Cilic M.[2]
Grenier H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-36-7106-3
Landaluce M.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-22-66-2
Schoolkate T.
Blockx A.
6-36-2
Boyer T.[8]
Krueger M.
6-17-5
Choinski J.
Spizzirri E.
5-76-46-4
Faria J.
Holt B.[3]
6-36-4
Fery A.
Fognini F.
6-37-65
Mannarino A.
Cazaux A.[7]
6-46-3