Marin Cilic vs Lloyd Harris — Nottingham 2 CH Round of 16

Nottingham 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Marin Cilic
CRO2
Marin Cilic
#88ATP
1800ELO
1756Grass ELO
$776kYTD
$33MCAREER
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 16 June 2025
grass
Lloyd Harris
RSA
Lloyd Harris
#187ATP
1665ELO
1608Grass ELO
$130kYTD
$4.7MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
Cilic M.
2-6 6-4 3-1
Harris L.
Cilic M.
263–
Harris L.
641–

Marin Cilic advanced when Lloyd Harris retired 2-6 6-4 3-1 in the Nottingham 2 CH round of 16. Marin Cilic claimed a first win over Lloyd Harris in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-05-26Roland GarrosQ3clayLloyd Harris6-3 4-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Cilic M.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Harris L.

Harris L.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Cilic M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cilic M.Harris L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
78%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
67%
66%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
9.2
10.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (64 vs 59). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cilic M.Harris L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
76
57
Break points saved·Even
99
95
Break points won·Clear edge
41
24
Deciding sets·Even
94
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cilic M.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Harris L.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.8+149 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Grass Elo 1608
6.7Overall Elo 1800
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1665
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
6.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
5.5
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cilic M.Harris L.
Freshness·
100
—

Cilic M.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Mochizuki S.
Smith C.
6-26-2
Cilic M.[2]
Landaluce M.
6-766-47-67
Quarter-finals
Mochizuki S.
Faria J.
6-26-0
Cilic M.[2]
Barrios Vera T.[6]
6-16-3
Landaluce M.
Atmane T.
6-736-26-3
Smith C.
Nava E.
6-756-46-4
R16
Cilic M.[2]
Harris L.
2-66-43-1
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Schoolkate T.
6-27-68
Landaluce M.
Mannarino A.
4-67-57-5
Atmane T.
Fery A.
5-76-36-4
Faria J.
Choinski J.
7-56-3
Smith C.
Mccabe J.
5-76-36-3
Mochizuki S.
Boyer T.[8]
6-26-3
Nava E.
Peniston R.
7-656-4
R32
Atmane T.
Gigante M.
4-66-46-4
Mochizuki S.
Herbert P.
6-47-67
Peniston R.
Galan D.[5]
5-76-46-2
Mccabe J.
Loffhagen G.
6-37-64
Smith C.
Trungelliti M.
6-24-66-3
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Trotter J.
6-36-4
Harris L.
Royer V.
7-666-2
Cilic M.[2]
Grenier H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-36-7106-3
Landaluce M.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-22-66-2
Schoolkate T.
Blockx A.
6-36-2
Boyer T.[8]
Krueger M.
6-17-5
Choinski J.
Spizzirri E.
5-76-46-4
Faria J.
Holt B.[3]
6-36-4
Fery A.
Fognini F.
6-37-65
Mannarino A.
Cazaux A.[7]
6-46-3