Marin Cilic vs Hugo Grenier — Nottingham 2 CH Round of 32

Nottingham 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Marin Cilic
CRO2
Marin Cilic
#88ATP
1800ELO
1756Grass ELO
$776kYTD
$33MCAREER
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 June 2025
grass
Hugo Grenier
FRA
Hugo Grenier
#221ATP
1548ELO
1458Grass ELO
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
Cilic M.
6-3 6-2
Grenier H.
Cilic M.
662
Grenier H.
320

Marin Cilic defeated Hugo Grenier 6-3 6-2 in the Nottingham 2 CH round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Marin Cilic came in ranked #88.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cilic M.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Grenier H.

Grenier H.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Cilic M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cilic M.Grenier H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
9.2
7.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (64 vs 88). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cilic M.Grenier H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
37
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
86
Break points won·Dominant
41
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
65
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cilic M.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Grenier H.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.8+298 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.2Grass Elo 1458
8.0Overall Elo 1800
ELO gap
2.0Overall Elo 1548
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
2.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
8.1
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cilic M.Grenier H.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
89

Cilic M.: 15 days rest · Grenier H.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Mochizuki S.
Smith C.
6-26-2
Cilic M.[2]
Landaluce M.
6-766-47-67
Quarter-finals
Mochizuki S.
Faria J.
6-26-0
Cilic M.[2]
Barrios Vera T.[6]
6-16-3
Landaluce M.
Atmane T.
6-736-26-3
Smith C.
Nava E.
6-756-46-4
R16
Cilic M.[2]
Harris L.
2-66-43-1
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Schoolkate T.
6-27-68
Landaluce M.
Mannarino A.
4-67-57-5
Atmane T.
Fery A.
5-76-36-4
Faria J.
Choinski J.
7-56-3
Smith C.
Mccabe J.
5-76-36-3
Mochizuki S.
Boyer T.[8]
6-26-3
Nava E.
Peniston R.
7-656-4
R32
Atmane T.
Gigante M.
4-66-46-4
Mochizuki S.
Herbert P.
6-47-67
Peniston R.
Galan D.[5]
5-76-46-2
Mccabe J.
Loffhagen G.
6-37-64
Smith C.
Trungelliti M.
6-24-66-3
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Trotter J.
6-36-4
Harris L.
Royer V.
7-666-2
Cilic M.[2]
Grenier H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-36-7106-3
Landaluce M.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-22-66-2
Schoolkate T.
Blockx A.
6-36-2
Boyer T.[8]
Krueger M.
6-17-5
Choinski J.
Spizzirri E.
5-76-46-4
Faria J.
Holt B.[3]
6-36-4
Fery A.
Fognini F.
6-37-65
Mannarino A.
Cazaux A.[7]
6-46-3