Jaime Faria vs Jan Choinski — Nottingham 2 CH Round of 16

Nottingham 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
POR
Jaime Faria
#92ATP
1735ELO
1624Grass ELO
$531kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 June 2025
grass
Jan Choinski
GBR
Jan Choinski
#75ATP
1686ELO
1534Grass ELO
$204kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWW
Faria J.
7-5 6-3
Choinski J.
Faria J.
762
Choinski J.
530

Jaime Faria defeated Jan Choinski 7-5 6-3 in the Nottingham 2 CH round of 16 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Jan Choinski came in ranked #75, but Jaime Faria had been the form player, winning 4 of their last 5 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Jaime Faria closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Faria J.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Choinski J.

Choinski J.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Faria J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Faria J.Choinski J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.4
4.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.7
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (91 vs 97). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Faria J.Choinski J.
Clutch Rating·Even
54
55
Break points saved·Clear edge
76
90
Break points won·Even
22
20
Deciding sets·Slight edge
81
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
76
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Faria J.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Choinski J.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.4+90 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Grass Elo 1534
6.1Overall Elo 1735
ELO gap
3.9Overall Elo 1686
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
1.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
7.2
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Faria J.Choinski J.
Freshness·Dominant
91
55

Faria J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Choinski J.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 113 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Mochizuki S.
Smith C.
6-26-2
Cilic M.[2]
Landaluce M.
6-766-47-67
Quarter-finals
Mochizuki S.
Faria J.
6-26-0
Cilic M.[2]
Barrios Vera T.[6]
6-16-3
Landaluce M.
Atmane T.
6-736-26-3
Smith C.
Nava E.
6-756-46-4
R16
Cilic M.[2]
Harris L.
2-66-43-1
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Schoolkate T.
6-27-68
Landaluce M.
Mannarino A.
4-67-57-5
Atmane T.
Fery A.
5-76-36-4
Faria J.
Choinski J.
7-56-3
Smith C.
Mccabe J.
5-76-36-3
Mochizuki S.
Boyer T.[8]
6-26-3
Nava E.
Peniston R.
7-656-4
R32
Atmane T.
Gigante M.
4-66-46-4
Mochizuki S.
Herbert P.
6-47-67
Peniston R.
Galan D.[5]
5-76-46-2
Mccabe J.
Loffhagen G.
6-37-64
Smith C.
Trungelliti M.
6-24-66-3
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Trotter J.
6-36-4
Harris L.
Royer V.
7-666-2
Cilic M.[2]
Grenier H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-36-7106-3
Landaluce M.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-22-66-2
Schoolkate T.
Blockx A.
6-36-2
Boyer T.[8]
Krueger M.
6-17-5
Choinski J.
Spizzirri E.
5-76-46-4
Faria J.
Holt B.[3]
6-36-4
Fery A.
Fognini F.
6-37-65
Mannarino A.
Cazaux A.[7]
6-46-3