Tristan Boyer vs Mitchell Krueger — Nottingham 2 CH Round of 32

Nottingham 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tristan Boyer
USA8
Tristan Boyer
#164ATP
1561ELO
1423Grass ELO
$105kYTD
$960kCAREER
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 June 2025
grass
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1424Grass ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
Boyer T.
6-1 7-5
Krueger M.
Boyer T.
672
Krueger M.
150

Tristan Boyer defeated Mitchell Krueger 6-1 7-5 in the Nottingham 2 CH round of 32 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Tristan Boyer came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Boyer T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Krueger M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Boyer T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Boyer T.Krueger M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Even
3.7
4.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (72 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Boyer T.Krueger M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
43
16
Break points saved·Even
83
87
Break points won·Slight edge
20
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
81
13
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
7
0

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Boyer T.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Krueger M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.8Grass Elo 1423
Surface ELO
5.2+0 Grass Elo edge
5.1Overall Elo 1561
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1461
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
6.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
7.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Boyer T.Krueger M.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
87

Boyer T.: 15 days rest · Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Mochizuki S.
Smith C.
6-26-2
Cilic M.[2]
Landaluce M.
6-766-47-67
Quarter-finals
Mochizuki S.
Faria J.
6-26-0
Cilic M.[2]
Barrios Vera T.[6]
6-16-3
Landaluce M.
Atmane T.
6-736-26-3
Smith C.
Nava E.
6-756-46-4
R16
Cilic M.[2]
Harris L.
2-66-43-1
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Schoolkate T.
6-27-68
Landaluce M.
Mannarino A.
4-67-57-5
Atmane T.
Fery A.
5-76-36-4
Faria J.
Choinski J.
7-56-3
Smith C.
Mccabe J.
5-76-36-3
Mochizuki S.
Boyer T.[8]
6-26-3
Nava E.
Peniston R.
7-656-4
R32
Atmane T.
Gigante M.
4-66-46-4
Mochizuki S.
Herbert P.
6-47-67
Peniston R.
Galan D.[5]
5-76-46-2
Mccabe J.
Loffhagen G.
6-37-64
Smith C.
Trungelliti M.
6-24-66-3
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Trotter J.
6-36-4
Harris L.
Royer V.
7-666-2
Cilic M.[2]
Grenier H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-36-7106-3
Landaluce M.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-22-66-2
Schoolkate T.
Blockx A.
6-36-2
Boyer T.[8]
Krueger M.
6-17-5
Choinski J.
Spizzirri E.
5-76-46-4
Faria J.
Holt B.[3]
6-36-4
Fery A.
Fognini F.
6-37-65
Mannarino A.
Cazaux A.[7]
6-46-3