Terence Atmane vs Matteo Gigante — Nottingham 2 CH Round of 32

Nottingham 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Terence Atmane
FRA
Terence Atmane
#50ATP
1704ELO
1544Grass ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 June 2025
grass
Matteo Gigante
ITA
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1457Grass ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Atmane T.
4-6 6-4 6-4
Gigante M.
Atmane T.
4662
Gigante M.
6441

Terence Atmane defeated Matteo Gigante 4-6 6-4 6-4 in the Nottingham 2 CH round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Terence Atmane came in ranked #50.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Atmane T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Gigante M.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Atmane T.Gigante M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
4.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 49). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Atmane T.Gigante M.
Clutch Rating·Even
56
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
78
Break points won·Slight edge
25
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
54
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Atmane T.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Gigante M.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
6.3+87 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.7Grass Elo 1457
6.9Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1592
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.3
Surface form
6.0
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Atmane T.Gigante M.
Freshness·
95
—

Atmane T.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cilic M.[2]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Mochizuki S.
Smith C.
6-26-2
Cilic M.[2]
Landaluce M.
6-766-47-67
Quarter-finals
Mochizuki S.
Faria J.
6-26-0
Cilic M.[2]
Barrios Vera T.[6]
6-16-3
Landaluce M.
Atmane T.
6-736-26-3
Smith C.
Nava E.
6-756-46-4
R16
Cilic M.[2]
Harris L.
2-66-43-1
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Schoolkate T.
6-27-68
Landaluce M.
Mannarino A.
4-67-57-5
Atmane T.
Fery A.
5-76-36-4
Faria J.
Choinski J.
7-56-3
Smith C.
Mccabe J.
5-76-36-3
Mochizuki S.
Boyer T.[8]
6-26-3
Nava E.
Peniston R.
7-656-4
R32
Atmane T.
Gigante M.
4-66-46-4
Mochizuki S.
Herbert P.
6-47-67
Peniston R.
Galan D.[5]
5-76-46-2
Mccabe J.
Loffhagen G.
6-37-64
Smith C.
Trungelliti M.
6-24-66-3
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Trotter J.
6-36-4
Harris L.
Royer V.
7-666-2
Cilic M.[2]
Grenier H.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-36-7106-3
Landaluce M.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-22-66-2
Schoolkate T.
Blockx A.
6-36-2
Boyer T.[8]
Krueger M.
6-17-5
Choinski J.
Spizzirri E.
5-76-46-4
Faria J.
Holt B.[3]
6-36-4
Fery A.
Fognini F.
6-37-65
Mannarino A.
Cazaux A.[7]
6-46-3