Yue Yuan vs Anastasija Sevastova — s Hertogenbosch Round of 32

s Hertogenbosch · WTA · Round of 32
CHN4
Yue Yuan
#121WTA
1629ELO
1495Grass ELO
27 yrs · 184 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
grass
Anastasija Sevastova
LAT
Anastasija Sevastova
#286WTA
1719ELO
1620Grass ELO
36 yrs · 169 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Yuan Y.
6-3 6-3
Sevastova A.
Yuan Y.
662
Sevastova A.
330

Yue Yuan defeated Anastasija Sevastova 6-3 6-3 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Yue Yuan came in ranked #121, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Yuan Y.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Sevastova A.

Sevastova A.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Yuan Y.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Yuan Y.Sevastova A.
1st serve in·Even
65%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
45%
Service points won·Even
57%
56%
Return points won·Even
43%
42%
Break points saved·Even
55%
56%
Aces / match·Even
2.2
2.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.5
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Yuan Y.Sevastova A.
Clutch Rating·Even
64
66
Break points saved·Slight edge
81
73
Break points won·Clear edge
77
89
Deciding sets·Clear edge
60
74
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
85
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Yuan Y.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Sevastova A.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
3.9Grass Elo 1495
Surface ELO
6.1+124 Grass Elo edge
4.4Overall Elo 1629
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1719
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.3
Surface form
5.9
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
6.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[3]
Ruse E.
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Mertens E.[3]
Alexandrova E.[1]
2-67-676-4
Ruse E.
Cocciaretto E.
2-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Mertens E.[3]
Yuan Y.[4]
6-06-4
Alexandrova E.[1]
Kudermetova V.[8]
5-76-46-2
Cocciaretto E.
Lamens S.
6-27-64
Ruse E.
Andreescu B.
6-26-4
R16
Lamens S.
Li A.
7-647-65
Kudermetova V.[8]
Minnen G.
6-46-1
Ruse E.
Branstine C.
6-46-3
Andreescu B.
Sun L.[7]
6-06-4
Cocciaretto E.
Pera B.
6-17-64
Mertens E.[3]
Sakkari M.
6-36-0
Alexandrova E.[1]
Blinkova A.
6-07-5
Yuan Y.[4]
Birrell K.
6-46-3
R32
Minnen G.
Collins D.
4-66-16-2
Yuan Y.[4]
Sevastova A.
6-36-3
Cocciaretto E.
Hartono A.
7-6117-5
Lamens S.
Wickmayer Y.
6-30-66-3
Sakkari M.
Koevermans A.
6-36-4
Mertens E.[3]
Tomova V.[8]
6-46-0
Blinkova A.
Siniakova K.
6-36-1
Andreescu B.
Garland J.
6-16-3
Birrell K.
Wang X.[6]
7-56-726-1
Branstine C.
Samsonova L.[1]
6-45-76-1
Ruse E.
Van Den Broek I.
6-26-1
Sun L.[7]
Vrancken Peeters A.
6-16-3
Pera B.
Linette M.[4]
6-26-7107-5
Kudermetova V.[8]
Kudermetova P.
6-36-3
Li A.
Potapova A.[5]
7-56-2
Alexandrova E.[1]
Bolkvadze M.
6-36-4