Brandon Nakashima vs Learner Tien — Stuttgart Round of 16

Stuttgart · ATP · Round of 16
Brandon Nakashima
USA6
Brandon Nakashima
#31ATP
1839ELO
1757Grass ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
grass
Learner Tien
USA
Learner Tien
#17ATP
1941ELO
1711Grass ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Nakashima B.
7-6 6-3
Tien L.
Nakashima B.
7762
Tien L.
6530

Brandon Nakashima defeated Learner Tien 7-6 6-3 in the Stuttgart round of 16 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nakashima B.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Tien L.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nakashima B.Tien L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.0
5.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.0
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 85). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nakashima B.Tien L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
90
Break points saved·Even
99
97
Break points won·Dominant
13
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
100
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
89
100

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nakashima B.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Tien L.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.4+45 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Grass Elo 1711
3.8Overall Elo 1839
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1941
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nakashima B.Tien L.
Freshness·Even
84
87

Nakashima B.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Tien L.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Fritz T.[2]
Zverev A.[1]
6-37-60
Semi-finals
Zverev A.[1]
Shelton B.[1]
7-687-61
Fritz T.[2]
Auger Aliassime F.[4]
6-47-65
Quarter-finals
Fritz T.[2]
Fucsovics M.
6-36-4
Shelton B.[1]
Lehecka J.[4]
6-46-4
Auger Aliassime F.[4]
Engel J.
7-636-3
Zverev A.[1]
Nakashima B.[6]
7-56-4
R16
Fritz T.[2]
Halys Q.
6-37-66
Nakashima B.[6]
Tien L.
7-656-3
Engel J.
Michelsen A.[7]
6-46-4
Zverev A.[1]
Moutet C.[8]
6-27-67
Lehecka J.[4]
Struff J.
6-47-5
Fucsovics M.
Rinderknech A.
7-646-3
Auger Aliassime F.[4]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-46-4
Shelton B.[1]
Herbert P.
7-647-5
R32
Herbert P.
Dzumhur D.
6-43-0
Tien L.
Nishioka Y.
6-737-630-0
Fucsovics M.
Hanfmann Y.
7-56-4
Moutet C.[8]
Fognini F.
6-46-736-3
Nakashima B.[6]
Fearnley J.
4-67-646-1
Halys Q.
Sonego L.
6-767-56-4
Engel J.
Duckworth J.
4-66-47-65
Michelsen A.[7]
Monfils G.
6-44-66-3
Lehecka J.[4]
Bonzi B.
6-46-4
Struff J.
Arnaldi M.
6-46-4
Rinderknech A.
Shapovalov D.[5]
6-42-66-0
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Safiullin R.
7-6103-67-5