Celine Naef vs Antonia Ruzic — Ilkley 125 Round of 16

Ilkley 125 · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
SUI
Celine Naef
#194WTA
1671ELO
1632Grass ELO
21 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
grass
Antonia Ruzic
CRO
Antonia Ruzic
#61WTA
1739ELO
1599Grass ELO
23 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWL
Naef C.
6-7 6-1 6-2
Ruzic A.
Naef C.
65662
Ruzic A.
77121

Celine Naef defeated Antonia Ruzic 6-7 6-1 6-2 in the Ilkley 125 round of 16 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Antonia Ruzic came in ranked #61.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Naef C.serving65% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Ruzic A.

Ruzic A.serving65% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Naef C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Naef C.Ruzic A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
57%
Return points won·Even
43%
45%
Break points saved·Even
57%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
2.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (68 vs 88). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Naef C.Ruzic A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
72
82
Break points saved·Even
81
84
Break points won·Slight edge
87
96
Deciding sets·Slight edge
73
82
Tiebreaks·
—
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Naef C.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Ruzic A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.1+32 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.9Grass Elo 1599
3.9Overall Elo 1671
ELO gap
6.1Overall Elo 1739
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.4
Surface form
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Naef C.Ruzic A.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
95

Naef C.: 18 days rest · Ruzic A.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Jovic I.
Marino R.
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Marino R.
Naef C.
6-34-66-2
Jovic I.
Golubic V.
6-06-3
Quarter-finals
Naef C.
Banks A.
5-76-46-4
Marino R.
Eala A.
1-66-07-64
Jovic I.
Gibson T.
6-33-66-3
Golubic V.
Parry D.
6-16-3
R16
Marino R.
Appleton E.
2-66-46-3
Gibson T.
Snigur D.
7-57-63
Eala A.
Ryser V.
6-16-2
Banks A.
Xu M.
6-26-1
Naef C.
Ruzic A.
6-756-16-2
Jovic I.
Lepchenko V.
6-36-726-0
Parry D.
Dart H.
6-37-5
Golubic V.
Jacquemot E.
6-13-66-2
R32
Ryser V.
Saito S.
6-06-4
Appleton E.
Waltert S.
3-66-46-3
Marino R.
Ponchet J.
6-46-4
Naef C.
Okamura K.
6-37-5
Ruzic A.
Mcdonald E.
6-33-66-4
Jovic I.
Masarova R.
3-66-36-4
Jacquemot E.
Wei S.
6-46-4
Eala A.
Cabrera L.
7-646-3
Gibson T.
Osuigwe W.
7-56-2
Parry D.
Stoiber R.
6-17-5
Dart H.
Rajecki A.
6-46-3
Banks A.
Gadecki O.
6-47-62
Xu M.
Konjuh A.
6-36-3
Golubic V.
Stefanini L.
6-45-76-3
Lepchenko V.
Jeanjean L.
7-56-4
Snigur D.
Starodubtseva Y.
3-66-06-0