Emilio Nava vs Andrej Martin — Bratislava CH Round of 32

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Emilio Nava
USA6
Emilio Nava
#86ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
hard
SVK
Andrej Martin
#402ATP
1470ELO
1373Hard ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWWL
Nava E.
6-1 6-1
Martin A.
Nava E.
662
Martin A.
110

Emilio Nava defeated Andrej Martin 6-1 6-1 in the Bratislava CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #86.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Martin A.

Martin A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nava E.Martin A.
39
Serve
—
21
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Martin A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
3.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 46). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Martin A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
12
Break points saved·Dominant
94
54
Break points won·Slight edge
17
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Martin A.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.1+248 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Hard Elo 1373
7.9Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
2.1Overall Elo 1470
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
2.8
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
8.0
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Martin A.
Freshness·
96
—

Nava E.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Prizmic D.
Royer V.[4]
6-47-66
Semi-finals
Prizmic D.
Garin C.[5]
6-36-2
Royer V.[4]
Shevchenko A.[1]
7-54-66-2
Quarter-finals
Garin C.[5]
Dodig M.
6-46-3
Prizmic D.
Rocha H.
6-46-1
Shevchenko A.[1]
Cina F.
7-636-4
Royer V.[4]
Topo M.
5-76-36-3
R16
Shevchenko A.[1]
Choinski J.
6-36-2
Royer V.[4]
Vacherot V.
1-66-36-4
Dodig M.
Kodat T.
7-626-3
Cina F.
Nava E.[6]
7-636-3
Garin C.[5]
Jianu F.
7-636-1
Prizmic D.
Karol M.
6-36-2
Rocha H.
Barrios Vera T.[2]
6-27-5
Topo M.
Mena F.
6-36-4
R32
Dodig M.
Faria J.[3]
7-52-0
Barrios Vera T.[2]
Vatutin A.
6-36-2
Jianu F.
Mikrut L.
6-26-736-1
Shevchenko A.[1]
Negritu C.
6-46-1
Kodat T.
Pokorny L.
6-34-67-62
Royer V.[4]
Prihodko O.
4-66-26-1
Mena F.
Gengel M.
6-26-2
Rocha H.
Michalski D.
6-26-1
Garin C.[5]
Shelbayh A.
6-17-63
Cina F.
Barton H.
7-656-3
Nava E.[6]
Martin A.
6-16-1
Choinski J.
Kovalik J.
6-36-4
Vacherot V.
Molcan A.
6-33-66-3
Karol M.
Klein L.[8]
6-26-4
Prizmic D.
Rodionov J.
6-16-4
Topo M.
Gombos N.
7-623-67-67