Ann Li vs Anastasia Potapova — s Hertogenbosch Round of 32

s Hertogenbosch · WTA · Round of 32
Ann Li
USA
Ann Li
#29WTA
1807ELO
1595Grass ELO
$718kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
grass
Anastasia Potapova
RUS5
Anastasia Potapova
#28WTA
1904ELO
1687Grass ELO
$1.2MYTD
$6.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
Li A.
7-5 6-2
Potapova A.
Li A.
762
Potapova A.
520

Ann Li defeated Anastasia Potapova 7-5 6-2 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Anastasia Potapova came in ranked #28, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Ann Li claimed a first win over Anastasia Potapova in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Ann Li closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-10-10Cluj NapocaR32hardAnastasia Potapova6-2 7-6(5)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Li A.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Potapova A.

Potapova A.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Li A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Li A.Potapova A.
1st serve in·Even
58%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
46%
Service points won·Even
58%
57%
Return points won·Even
43%
45%
Break points saved·Even
56%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
2.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
4.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 62). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Li A.Potapova A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
76
81
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
89
Break points won·Even
87
88
Deciding sets·Slight edge
87
96
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
66
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Li A.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Potapova A.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
3.6Grass Elo 1595
Surface ELO
6.4+92 Grass Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1807
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1904
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.1
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Li A.Potapova A.
Freshness·Even
96
98

Li A.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Potapova A.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[3]
Ruse E.
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Mertens E.[3]
Alexandrova E.[1]
2-67-676-4
Ruse E.
Cocciaretto E.
2-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Mertens E.[3]
Yuan Y.[4]
6-06-4
Alexandrova E.[1]
Kudermetova V.[8]
5-76-46-2
Cocciaretto E.
Lamens S.
6-27-64
Ruse E.
Andreescu B.
6-26-4
R16
Lamens S.
Li A.
7-647-65
Kudermetova V.[8]
Minnen G.
6-46-1
Ruse E.
Branstine C.
6-46-3
Andreescu B.
Sun L.[7]
6-06-4
Cocciaretto E.
Pera B.
6-17-64
Mertens E.[3]
Sakkari M.
6-36-0
Alexandrova E.[1]
Blinkova A.
6-07-5
Yuan Y.[4]
Birrell K.
6-46-3
R32
Minnen G.
Collins D.
4-66-16-2
Yuan Y.[4]
Sevastova A.
6-36-3
Cocciaretto E.
Hartono A.
7-6117-5
Lamens S.
Wickmayer Y.
6-30-66-3
Sakkari M.
Koevermans A.
6-36-4
Mertens E.[3]
Tomova V.[8]
6-46-0
Blinkova A.
Siniakova K.
6-36-1
Andreescu B.
Garland J.
6-16-3
Birrell K.
Wang X.[6]
7-56-726-1
Branstine C.
Samsonova L.[1]
6-45-76-1
Ruse E.
Van Den Broek I.
6-26-1
Sun L.[7]
Vrancken Peeters A.
6-16-3
Pera B.
Linette M.[4]
6-26-7107-5
Kudermetova V.[8]
Kudermetova P.
6-36-3
Li A.
Potapova A.[5]
7-56-2
Alexandrova E.[1]
Bolkvadze M.
6-36-4