Suzan Lamens vs Ann Li — s Hertogenbosch Round of 16

s Hertogenbosch · WTA · Round of 16
Suzan Lamens
NEDWC
Suzan Lamens
#129WTA
1622ELO
1524Grass ELO
27 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
grass
Ann Li
USA
Ann Li
#29WTA
1807ELO
1595Grass ELO
$718kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
Lamens S.
7-6 7-6
Li A.
Lamens S.
77772
Li A.
64650

Suzan Lamens defeated Ann Li 7-6 7-6 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 16 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Ann Li came in ranked #29, but Suzan Lamens had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 5 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lamens S.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Li A.

Li A.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lamens S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lamens S.Li A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
42%
46%
Service points won·Even
54%
58%
Return points won·Even
45%
43%
Break points saved·Even
51%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.6
4.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lamens S.Li A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
43
76
Break points saved·Dominant
51
83
Break points won·Slight edge
95
87
Deciding sets·Dominant
31
87
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
78
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lamens S.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Li A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
4.2Grass Elo 1524
Surface ELO
5.8+71 Grass Elo edge
2.6Overall Elo 1622
ELO gap
7.4Overall Elo 1807
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.0
Surface form
3.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Lamens S.Li A.
Freshness·Even
100
96

Lamens S.: 17 days rest · Li A.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[3]
Ruse E.
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Mertens E.[3]
Alexandrova E.[1]
2-67-676-4
Ruse E.
Cocciaretto E.
2-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Mertens E.[3]
Yuan Y.[4]
6-06-4
Alexandrova E.[1]
Kudermetova V.[8]
5-76-46-2
Cocciaretto E.
Lamens S.
6-27-64
Ruse E.
Andreescu B.
6-26-4
R16
Lamens S.
Li A.
7-647-65
Kudermetova V.[8]
Minnen G.
6-46-1
Ruse E.
Branstine C.
6-46-3
Andreescu B.
Sun L.[7]
6-06-4
Cocciaretto E.
Pera B.
6-17-64
Mertens E.[3]
Sakkari M.
6-36-0
Alexandrova E.[1]
Blinkova A.
6-07-5
Yuan Y.[4]
Birrell K.
6-46-3
R32
Minnen G.
Collins D.
4-66-16-2
Yuan Y.[4]
Sevastova A.
6-36-3
Cocciaretto E.
Hartono A.
7-6117-5
Lamens S.
Wickmayer Y.
6-30-66-3
Sakkari M.
Koevermans A.
6-36-4
Mertens E.[3]
Tomova V.[8]
6-46-0
Blinkova A.
Siniakova K.
6-36-1
Andreescu B.
Garland J.
6-16-3
Birrell K.
Wang X.[6]
7-56-726-1
Branstine C.
Samsonova L.[1]
6-45-76-1
Ruse E.
Van Den Broek I.
6-26-1
Sun L.[7]
Vrancken Peeters A.
6-16-3
Pera B.
Linette M.[4]
6-26-7107-5
Kudermetova V.[8]
Kudermetova P.
6-36-3
Li A.
Potapova A.[5]
7-56-2
Alexandrova E.[1]
Bolkvadze M.
6-36-4