Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva vs Mariano Kestelboim — Santa Fe CH Round of 16

Santa Fe CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#250ATP
1486ELO
1470Clay ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
clay
Mariano Kestelboim
ARG
Mariano Kestelboim
#692ATP
1198ELO
1189Clay ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Reis Da Silva J.
6-1 6-2
Kestelboim M.
Reis Da Silva J.
662
Kestelboim M.
120

Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva defeated Mariano Kestelboim 6-1 6-2 in the Santa Fe CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Reis Da Silva J.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Kestelboim M.

Kestelboim M.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Reis Da Silva J.Kestelboim M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
57%
Return points won·Even
41%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
52%
Aces / match·Even
2.1
1.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 51). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Reis Da Silva J.Kestelboim M.
Clutch Rating·Even
12
14
Break points saved·Dominant
49
7
Break points won·Dominant
43
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
9
68
Tiebreaks·
17
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Reis Da Silva J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Kestelboim M.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
8.5+281 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.5Clay Elo 1189
8.4Overall Elo 1486
ELO gap
1.6Overall Elo 1198
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
6.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Reis Da Silva J.
Midon L.[7]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Midon L.[7]
Blanch D.
6-26-1
Reis Da Silva J.
Collarini A.[3]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Midon L.[7]
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
6-27-67
Blanch D.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.[4]
7-54-66-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Bueno G.
6-36-3
Collarini A.[3]
Casanova H.
6-46-3
R16
Collarini A.[3]
Villanueva G.
6-46-4
Blanch D.
Kuzuhara B.
7-56-2
Midon L.[7]
Bagnis F.
7-56-4
Casanova H.
Jones M.
6-36-2
Bueno G.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-37-67
Reis Da Silva J.
Kestelboim M.
6-16-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.[4]
Ambrogi L.
7-634-66-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Sperle J.
7-676-2
R32
Kestelboim M.
Guillen Meza A.[1]
6-42-67-5
Collarini A.[3]
Barreto Sanchez D.
6-47-5
Kuzuhara B.
Roncadelli F.
6-02-67-5
Ambrogi L.
Cigarran T.
7-56-0
Midon L.[7]
Rodriguez L.
6-17-5
Boscardin Dias P.
La Serna J.
6-26-0
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Aguilar Cardozo J.
7-56-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.[4]
Leite W.
6-26-4
Bueno G.
Torres J.[5]
6-36-3
Sperle J.
Olivo R.
7-646-2
Blanch D.
Sakamoto P.[8]
5-76-16-0
Bagnis F.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-36-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Gimenez I.
6-36-4
Jones M.
Farjat T.
6-36-4
Villanueva G.
Gerch L.
7-676-736-3
Casanova H.
Olivieri G.[6]
6-36-3