Marko Topo vs Norbert Gombos — Bratislava CH Round of 32

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Marko Topo
#374ATP
1463ELO
1473Hard ELO
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
hard
Norbert Gombos
SVK
Norbert Gombos
#370ATP
1472ELO
1452Hard ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
Topo M.
7-6 3-6 7-6
Gombos N.
Topo M.
773792
Gombos N.
626671

Marko Topo defeated Norbert Gombos 7-6 3-6 7-6 in the Bratislava CH round of 32 on hard. Marko Topo extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Marko Topo closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-04-25MunichQ2clayMarko Topo3-6 6-3 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Topo M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Gombos N.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Topo M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Topo M.Gombos N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
67%
57%
Aces / match·Even
4.6
4.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (64 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Topo M.Gombos N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
28
41
Break points saved·Even
87
83
Break points won·Even
4
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
12
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Topo M.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Gombos N.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+21 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Hard Elo 1452
5.2Overall Elo 1463
ELO gap
4.8Overall Elo 1472
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
3.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.1
Minutes 14d
5.8
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Topo M.Gombos N.
Freshness·Even
79
79

Topo M.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 35 games (7d) · Gombos N.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Prizmic D.
Royer V.[4]
6-47-66
Semi-finals
Prizmic D.
Garin C.[5]
6-36-2
Royer V.[4]
Shevchenko A.[1]
7-54-66-2
Quarter-finals
Garin C.[5]
Dodig M.
6-46-3
Prizmic D.
Rocha H.
6-46-1
Shevchenko A.[1]
Cina F.
7-636-4
Royer V.[4]
Topo M.
5-76-36-3
R16
Shevchenko A.[1]
Choinski J.
6-36-2
Royer V.[4]
Vacherot V.
1-66-36-4
Dodig M.
Kodat T.
7-626-3
Cina F.
Nava E.[6]
7-636-3
Garin C.[5]
Jianu F.
7-636-1
Prizmic D.
Karol M.
6-36-2
Rocha H.
Barrios Vera T.[2]
6-27-5
Topo M.
Mena F.
6-36-4
R32
Dodig M.
Faria J.[3]
7-52-0
Barrios Vera T.[2]
Vatutin A.
6-36-2
Jianu F.
Mikrut L.
6-26-736-1
Shevchenko A.[1]
Negritu C.
6-46-1
Kodat T.
Pokorny L.
6-34-67-62
Royer V.[4]
Prihodko O.
4-66-26-1
Mena F.
Gengel M.
6-26-2
Rocha H.
Michalski D.
6-26-1
Garin C.[5]
Shelbayh A.
6-17-63
Cina F.
Barton H.
7-656-3
Nava E.[6]
Martin A.
6-16-1
Choinski J.
Kovalik J.
6-36-4
Vacherot V.
Molcan A.
6-33-66-3
Karol M.
Klein L.[8]
6-26-4
Prizmic D.
Rodionov J.
6-16-4
Topo M.
Gombos N.
7-623-67-67