Facundo Mena vs Marek Gengel — Bratislava CH Round of 32

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1355Hard ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
hard
Marek Gengel
CZE
Marek Gengel
#373ATP
1411ELO
1377Hard ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Mena F.
6-2 6-2
Gengel M.
Mena F.
662
Gengel M.
220

Facundo Mena defeated Marek Gengel 6-2 6-2 in the Bratislava CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Facundo Mena came in ranked #331, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Facundo Mena extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-09-19San DiegoQ2hardFacundo Mena6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Mena F.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gengel M.

Gengel M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mena F.Gengel M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
45%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.4
5.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (69 vs 58). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mena F.Gengel M.
Clutch Rating·Even
9
11
Break points saved·Clear edge
57
35
Break points won·Even
7
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
54
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
10
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mena F.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Gengel M.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 91 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.8Hard Elo 1355
Surface ELO
5.2+23 Hard Elo edge
5.3Overall Elo 1427
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1411
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.6
Surface form
4.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.1
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mena F.Gengel M.
Freshness·
70
—

Mena F.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Prizmic D.
Royer V.[4]
6-47-66
Semi-finals
Prizmic D.
Garin C.[5]
6-36-2
Royer V.[4]
Shevchenko A.[1]
7-54-66-2
Quarter-finals
Garin C.[5]
Dodig M.
6-46-3
Prizmic D.
Rocha H.
6-46-1
Shevchenko A.[1]
Cina F.
7-636-4
Royer V.[4]
Topo M.
5-76-36-3
R16
Shevchenko A.[1]
Choinski J.
6-36-2
Royer V.[4]
Vacherot V.
1-66-36-4
Dodig M.
Kodat T.
7-626-3
Cina F.
Nava E.[6]
7-636-3
Garin C.[5]
Jianu F.
7-636-1
Prizmic D.
Karol M.
6-36-2
Rocha H.
Barrios Vera T.[2]
6-27-5
Topo M.
Mena F.
6-36-4
R32
Dodig M.
Faria J.[3]
7-52-0
Barrios Vera T.[2]
Vatutin A.
6-36-2
Jianu F.
Mikrut L.
6-26-736-1
Shevchenko A.[1]
Negritu C.
6-46-1
Kodat T.
Pokorny L.
6-34-67-62
Royer V.[4]
Prihodko O.
4-66-26-1
Mena F.
Gengel M.
6-26-2
Rocha H.
Michalski D.
6-26-1
Garin C.[5]
Shelbayh A.
6-17-63
Cina F.
Barton H.
7-656-3
Nava E.[6]
Martin A.
6-16-1
Choinski J.
Kovalik J.
6-36-4
Vacherot V.
Molcan A.
6-33-66-3
Karol M.
Klein L.[8]
6-26-4
Prizmic D.
Rodionov J.
6-16-4
Topo M.
Gombos N.
7-623-67-67