Oliver Crawford vs Brandon Holt — Ilkley CH Round of 32

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Oliver Crawford
GBR
Oliver Crawford
#235ATP
1444ELO
1457Grass ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
grass
USA2
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Grass ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Crawford O.
6-3 6-7 7-6
Holt B.
Crawford O.
662772
Holt B.
377651

Oliver Crawford defeated Brandon Holt 6-3 6-7 7-6 in the Ilkley CH round of 32 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Oliver Crawford closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Crawford O.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving88% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Crawford O.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Crawford O.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
5.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.0
0.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (61 vs 75). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Crawford O.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
12
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
64
85
Break points won·Clear edge
18
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
19
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Crawford O.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Holt B.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.4Grass Elo 1457
Surface ELO
5.6+50 Grass Elo edge
3.8Overall Elo 1444
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1537
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
6.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
6.8
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Schoolkate T.[7]
Pinnington Jones J.
6-786-46-3
Semi-finals
Pinnington Jones J.
Mochizuki S.
7-656-4
Schoolkate T.[7]
Svajda Z.
6-47-66
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.[7]
Shimabukuro S.
3-66-37-64
Pinnington Jones J.
Landaluce M.[8]
7-56-2
Svajda Z.
Riedi L.
7-684-67-5
Mochizuki S.
Crawford O.
6-46-2
R16
Riedi L.
Cassone M.
6-46-3
Svajda Z.
Cilic M.[4]
6-36-4
Landaluce M.[8]
Harris L.
6-36-0
Shimabukuro S.
Trotter J.
6-34-66-4
Pinnington Jones J.
Harris B.[3]
7-644-66-3
Schoolkate T.[7]
Searle H.
2-66-16-4
Mochizuki S.
Monday J.
6-46-756-3
Crawford O.
Brooksby J.
6-47-5
R32
Trotter J.
Rodesch C.
6-16-4
Schoolkate T.[7]
Mayot H.
3-67-57-5
Riedi L.
Clarke J.
6-36-2
Shimabukuro S.
Majchrzak K.[1]
6-46-4
Searle H.
Wong C.
6-36-2
Cilic M.[4]
Jubb P.
6-37-66
Cassone M.
Eubanks C.[5]
6-46-3
Crawford O.
Holt B.[2]
6-36-727-65
Harris B.[3]
Gojo B.
6-26-3
Brooksby J.
Watanuki Y.
7-656-3
Monday J.
Atmane T.[6]
7-646-3
Pinnington Jones J.
Kukushkin M.
6-27-5
Mochizuki S.
Smith C.
6-43-66-2
Harris L.
Blanchet U.
6-26-2
Svajda Z.
Bolt A.
6-757-657-5
Landaluce M.[8]
Habib H.
6-46-736-3