Elisabetta Cocciaretto vs Suzan Lamens — s Hertogenbosch Quarter-final

s Hertogenbosch · WTA · Quarter-final
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
ITA
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
#46WTA
1805ELO
1680Grass ELO
$555kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 166 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
grass
Suzan Lamens
NEDWC
Suzan Lamens
#129WTA
1622ELO
1524Grass ELO
27 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWL
Cocciaretto E.
6-2 7-6
Lamens S.
Cocciaretto E.
6772
Lamens S.
2640

Elisabetta Cocciaretto defeated Suzan Lamens 6-2 7-6 in the s Hertogenbosch quarter-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Elisabetta Cocciaretto came in ranked #46.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cocciaretto E.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lamens S.

Lamens S.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Cocciaretto E.

Serve advantage — Cocciaretto E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cocciaretto E.Lamens S.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
62%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
42%
Service points won·Even
58%
54%
Return points won·Even
44%
45%
Break points saved·Even
56%
52%
Aces / match·Even
1.7
1.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.9
5.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (79 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cocciaretto E.Lamens S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
80
43
Break points saved·Dominant
85
51
Break points won·Even
95
95
Deciding sets·Dominant
77
31
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
87
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cocciaretto E.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Lamens S.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
7.5+156 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Grass Elo 1524
7.6Overall Elo 1805
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1622
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
2.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cocciaretto E.Lamens S.
Freshness·Even
97
100

Cocciaretto E.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Lamens S.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[3]
Ruse E.
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Mertens E.[3]
Alexandrova E.[1]
2-67-676-4
Ruse E.
Cocciaretto E.
2-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Mertens E.[3]
Yuan Y.[4]
6-06-4
Alexandrova E.[1]
Kudermetova V.[8]
5-76-46-2
Cocciaretto E.
Lamens S.
6-27-64
Ruse E.
Andreescu B.
6-26-4
R16
Lamens S.
Li A.
7-647-65
Kudermetova V.[8]
Minnen G.
6-46-1
Ruse E.
Branstine C.
6-46-3
Andreescu B.
Sun L.[7]
6-06-4
Cocciaretto E.
Pera B.
6-17-64
Mertens E.[3]
Sakkari M.
6-36-0
Alexandrova E.[1]
Blinkova A.
6-07-5
Yuan Y.[4]
Birrell K.
6-46-3
R32
Minnen G.
Collins D.
4-66-16-2
Yuan Y.[4]
Sevastova A.
6-36-3
Cocciaretto E.
Hartono A.
7-6117-5
Lamens S.
Wickmayer Y.
6-30-66-3
Sakkari M.
Koevermans A.
6-36-4
Mertens E.[3]
Tomova V.[8]
6-46-0
Blinkova A.
Siniakova K.
6-36-1
Andreescu B.
Garland J.
6-16-3
Birrell K.
Wang X.[6]
7-56-726-1
Branstine C.
Samsonova L.[1]
6-45-76-1
Ruse E.
Van Den Broek I.
6-26-1
Sun L.[7]
Vrancken Peeters A.
6-16-3
Pera B.
Linette M.[4]
6-26-7107-5
Kudermetova V.[8]
Kudermetova P.
6-36-3
Li A.
Potapova A.[5]
7-56-2
Alexandrova E.[1]
Bolkvadze M.
6-36-4