Federico Cina vs Emilio Nava — Bratislava CH Round of 16

Bratislava CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ITA
Federico Cina
#184ATP
1630ELO
1583Hard ELO
$293kYTD
$533kCAREER
19 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
hard
Emilio Nava
USA6
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Cina F.
7-6 6-3
Nava E.
Cina F.
7762
Nava E.
6330

Federico Cina defeated Emilio Nava 7-6 6-3 in the Bratislava CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

  • Match story: Federico Cina closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cina F.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Cina F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cina F.Nava E.
—
Serve
39
—
Return
21

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cina F.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.1
7.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (70 vs 120). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cina F.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
42
52
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
94
Break points won·Clear edge
32
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
52
89
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
28
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cina F.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Nava E.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.8Hard Elo 1583
Surface ELO
6.2+38 Hard Elo edge
2.7Overall Elo 1630
ELO gap
7.3Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.0
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.7
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cina F.Nava E.
Freshness·Dominant
69
96

Cina F.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 71 games (7d) · Nava E.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Prizmic D.
Royer V.[4]
6-47-66
Semi-finals
Prizmic D.
Garin C.[5]
6-36-2
Royer V.[4]
Shevchenko A.[1]
7-54-66-2
Quarter-finals
Garin C.[5]
Dodig M.
6-46-3
Prizmic D.
Rocha H.
6-46-1
Shevchenko A.[1]
Cina F.
7-636-4
Royer V.[4]
Topo M.
5-76-36-3
R16
Shevchenko A.[1]
Choinski J.
6-36-2
Royer V.[4]
Vacherot V.
1-66-36-4
Dodig M.
Kodat T.
7-626-3
Cina F.
Nava E.[6]
7-636-3
Garin C.[5]
Jianu F.
7-636-1
Prizmic D.
Karol M.
6-36-2
Rocha H.
Barrios Vera T.[2]
6-27-5
Topo M.
Mena F.
6-36-4
R32
Dodig M.
Faria J.[3]
7-52-0
Barrios Vera T.[2]
Vatutin A.
6-36-2
Jianu F.
Mikrut L.
6-26-736-1
Shevchenko A.[1]
Negritu C.
6-46-1
Kodat T.
Pokorny L.
6-34-67-62
Royer V.[4]
Prihodko O.
4-66-26-1
Mena F.
Gengel M.
6-26-2
Rocha H.
Michalski D.
6-26-1
Garin C.[5]
Shelbayh A.
6-17-63
Cina F.
Barton H.
7-656-3
Nava E.[6]
Martin A.
6-16-1
Choinski J.
Kovalik J.
6-36-4
Vacherot V.
Molcan A.
6-33-66-3
Karol M.
Klein L.[8]
6-26-4
Prizmic D.
Rodionov J.
6-16-4
Topo M.
Gombos N.
7-623-67-67