Marin Cilic vs Paul Jubb — Ilkley CH Round of 32

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Marin Cilic
CRO4
Marin Cilic
#88ATP
1800ELO
1756Grass ELO
$776kYTD
$33MCAREER
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
grass
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1445Grass ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
Cilic M.
6-3 7-6
Jubb P.
Cilic M.
6782
Jubb P.
3660

Marin Cilic defeated Paul Jubb 6-3 7-6 in the Ilkley CH round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Marin Cilic came in ranked #88.

Key context

  • Match story: Marin Cilic closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cilic M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Jubb P.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Cilic M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cilic M.Jubb P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
62%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
78%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Clear edge
69%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.2
3.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.8
4.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (64 vs 36). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cilic M.Jubb P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
38
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
84
Break points won·Dominant
41
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
44
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
87
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cilic M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Jubb P.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.2+311 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.8Grass Elo 1445
9.9Overall Elo 1800
ELO gap
0.1Overall Elo 1426
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.2
Surface form
6.2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.8
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
3.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cilic M.Jubb P.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Cilic M.: 15 days rest · Jubb P.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Schoolkate T.[7]
Pinnington Jones J.
6-786-46-3
Semi-finals
Pinnington Jones J.
Mochizuki S.
7-656-4
Schoolkate T.[7]
Svajda Z.
6-47-66
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.[7]
Shimabukuro S.
3-66-37-64
Pinnington Jones J.
Landaluce M.[8]
7-56-2
Svajda Z.
Riedi L.
7-684-67-5
Mochizuki S.
Crawford O.
6-46-2
R16
Riedi L.
Cassone M.
6-46-3
Svajda Z.
Cilic M.[4]
6-36-4
Landaluce M.[8]
Harris L.
6-36-0
Shimabukuro S.
Trotter J.
6-34-66-4
Pinnington Jones J.
Harris B.[3]
7-644-66-3
Schoolkate T.[7]
Searle H.
2-66-16-4
Mochizuki S.
Monday J.
6-46-756-3
Crawford O.
Brooksby J.
6-47-5
R32
Trotter J.
Rodesch C.
6-16-4
Schoolkate T.[7]
Mayot H.
3-67-57-5
Riedi L.
Clarke J.
6-36-2
Shimabukuro S.
Majchrzak K.[1]
6-46-4
Searle H.
Wong C.
6-36-2
Cilic M.[4]
Jubb P.
6-37-66
Cassone M.
Eubanks C.[5]
6-46-3
Crawford O.
Holt B.[2]
6-36-727-65
Harris B.[3]
Gojo B.
6-26-3
Brooksby J.
Watanuki Y.
7-656-3
Monday J.
Atmane T.[6]
7-646-3
Pinnington Jones J.
Kukushkin M.
6-27-5
Mochizuki S.
Smith C.
6-43-66-2
Harris L.
Blanchet U.
6-26-2
Svajda Z.
Bolt A.
6-757-657-5
Landaluce M.[8]
Habib H.
6-46-736-3