Lloyd Harris vs Ugo Blanchet — Ilkley CH Round of 32

Ilkley CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Lloyd Harris
RSA
Lloyd Harris
#187ATP
1665ELO
1608Grass ELO
$130kYTD
$4.7MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
grass
FRA
Ugo Blanchet
#174ATP
1521ELO
1404Grass ELO
$119kYTD
$989kCAREER
27 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWWL
Harris L.
6-2 6-2
Blanchet U.
Harris L.
662
Blanchet U.
220

Lloyd Harris defeated Ugo Blanchet 6-2 6-2 in the Ilkley CH round of 32 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Harris L.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Blanchet U.

Blanchet U.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Harris L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Harris L.Blanchet U.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
64%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.5
5.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (59 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Harris L.Blanchet U.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
57
34
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
89
Break points won·Slight edge
24
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
24
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Harris L.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Blanchet U.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
7.4+203 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Grass Elo 1404
6.8Overall Elo 1665
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1521
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.9
Surface form
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
3.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Schoolkate T.[7]
Pinnington Jones J.
6-786-46-3
Semi-finals
Pinnington Jones J.
Mochizuki S.
7-656-4
Schoolkate T.[7]
Svajda Z.
6-47-66
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.[7]
Shimabukuro S.
3-66-37-64
Pinnington Jones J.
Landaluce M.[8]
7-56-2
Svajda Z.
Riedi L.
7-684-67-5
Mochizuki S.
Crawford O.
6-46-2
R16
Riedi L.
Cassone M.
6-46-3
Svajda Z.
Cilic M.[4]
6-36-4
Landaluce M.[8]
Harris L.
6-36-0
Shimabukuro S.
Trotter J.
6-34-66-4
Pinnington Jones J.
Harris B.[3]
7-644-66-3
Schoolkate T.[7]
Searle H.
2-66-16-4
Mochizuki S.
Monday J.
6-46-756-3
Crawford O.
Brooksby J.
6-47-5
R32
Trotter J.
Rodesch C.
6-16-4
Schoolkate T.[7]
Mayot H.
3-67-57-5
Riedi L.
Clarke J.
6-36-2
Shimabukuro S.
Majchrzak K.[1]
6-46-4
Searle H.
Wong C.
6-36-2
Cilic M.[4]
Jubb P.
6-37-66
Cassone M.
Eubanks C.[5]
6-46-3
Crawford O.
Holt B.[2]
6-36-727-65
Harris B.[3]
Gojo B.
6-26-3
Brooksby J.
Watanuki Y.
7-656-3
Monday J.
Atmane T.[6]
7-646-3
Pinnington Jones J.
Kukushkin M.
6-27-5
Mochizuki S.
Smith C.
6-43-66-2
Harris L.
Blanchet U.
6-26-2
Svajda Z.
Bolt A.
6-757-657-5
Landaluce M.[8]
Habib H.
6-46-736-3