Kimberly Birrell vs Xin Yu Wang — s Hertogenbosch Round of 32

s Hertogenbosch · WTA · Round of 32
Kimberly Birrell
AUS
Kimberly Birrell
#72WTA
1754ELO
1602Grass ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
grass
CHN6
Xin Yu Wang
1760ELO
1698Grass ELO
24 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLL
Birrell K.
7-5 6-7 6-1
Wang X.
Birrell K.
76262
Wang X.
57711

Kimberly Birrell defeated Xin Yu Wang 7-5 6-7 6-1 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 32 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Kimberly Birrell came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Birrell K.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Wang X.

Wang X.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Birrell K.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Birrell K.Wang X.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
59%
Return points won·Even
44%
42%
Break points saved·Even
54%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.2
3.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (88 vs 69). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Birrell K.Wang X.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
65
60
Break points saved·Slight edge
77
86
Break points won·Slight edge
83
78
Deciding sets·Clear edge
65
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Birrell K.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Wang X.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
3.8Grass Elo 1602
Surface ELO
6.2+96 Grass Elo edge
5.1Overall Elo 1754
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1760
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
6.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Birrell K.Wang X.
Freshness·
94
—

Birrell K.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mertens E.[3]
Ruse E.
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Mertens E.[3]
Alexandrova E.[1]
2-67-676-4
Ruse E.
Cocciaretto E.
2-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Mertens E.[3]
Yuan Y.[4]
6-06-4
Alexandrova E.[1]
Kudermetova V.[8]
5-76-46-2
Cocciaretto E.
Lamens S.
6-27-64
Ruse E.
Andreescu B.
6-26-4
R16
Lamens S.
Li A.
7-647-65
Kudermetova V.[8]
Minnen G.
6-46-1
Ruse E.
Branstine C.
6-46-3
Andreescu B.
Sun L.[7]
6-06-4
Cocciaretto E.
Pera B.
6-17-64
Mertens E.[3]
Sakkari M.
6-36-0
Alexandrova E.[1]
Blinkova A.
6-07-5
Yuan Y.[4]
Birrell K.
6-46-3
R32
Minnen G.
Collins D.
4-66-16-2
Yuan Y.[4]
Sevastova A.
6-36-3
Cocciaretto E.
Hartono A.
7-6117-5
Lamens S.
Wickmayer Y.
6-30-66-3
Sakkari M.
Koevermans A.
6-36-4
Mertens E.[3]
Tomova V.[8]
6-46-0
Blinkova A.
Siniakova K.
6-36-1
Andreescu B.
Garland J.
6-16-3
Birrell K.
Wang X.[6]
7-56-726-1
Branstine C.
Samsonova L.[1]
6-45-76-1
Ruse E.
Van Den Broek I.
6-26-1
Sun L.[7]
Vrancken Peeters A.
6-16-3
Pera B.
Linette M.[4]
6-26-7107-5
Kudermetova V.[8]
Kudermetova P.
6-36-3
Li A.
Potapova A.[5]
7-56-2
Alexandrova E.[1]
Bolkvadze M.
6-36-4