Zizou Bergs vs Mark Lajal — s Hertogenbosch Quarter-final

s Hertogenbosch · ATP · Quarter-final
Zizou Bergs
BEL8
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1712Grass ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2025
grass
ESTQ
Mark Lajal
#159ATP
1589ELO
1546Grass ELO
$97kYTD
$654kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
Bergs Z.
7-6 7-6
Lajal M.
Bergs Z.
77772
Lajal M.
62640

Zizou Bergs defeated Mark Lajal 7-6 7-6 in the s Hertogenbosch quarter-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #35, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bergs Z.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Lajal M.

Lajal M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bergs Z.Lajal M.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Even
6.5
5.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.2
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (78 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bergs Z.Lajal M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
69
43
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
89
Break points won·Slight edge
21
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
42
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
91
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bergs Z.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Lajal M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1+166 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Grass Elo 1546
7.8Overall Elo 1808
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1589
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
5.9
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.7
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bergs Z.Lajal M.
Freshness·Slight edge
82
88

Bergs Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Lajal M.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Bergs Z.[8]
7-57-68
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.[8]
Opelka R.
6-16-4
Diallo G.
Humbert U.[5]
6-37-64
Quarter-finals
Opelka R.
Medvedev D.[3]
7-657-65
Bergs Z.[8]
Lajal M.
7-627-64
Diallo G.
Khachanov K.[3]
7-666-4
Humbert U.[5]
Borges N.[7]
6-16-4
R16
Bergs Z.[8]
Popyrin A.[4]
6-736-27-63
Borges N.
Virtanen O.
W/O
Lajal M.
Hurkacz H.[5]
W/O
Opelka R.
Jarry N.
7-656-3
Diallo G.
Thompson J.[6]
4-66-17-5
Medvedev D.[3]
Mannarino A.
7-666-4
Khachanov K.[3]
Mcdonald M.
6-35-77-64
Humbert U.[5]
Evans D.
7-56-3
R32
Thompson J.[6]
Kovacevic A.
6-46-4
Diallo G.
Vukic A.
7-57-62
Hurkacz H.[5]
Bautista Agut R.
7-626-4
Lajal M.
Djere L.
6-26-4
Mcdonald M.
Bellucci M.
6-16-746-3
Jarry N.
Darderi L.[8]
5-76-47-63
Mannarino A.
Oconnell C.
6-16-3
Borges N.[7]
Basavareddy N.
7-626-2
Bergs Z.[8]
Blockx A.
6-31-67-63
Evans D.
Hijikata R.
3-66-46-3
Virtanen O.
Etcheverry T.
7-667-5
Opelka R.
De Jong J.
6-757-656-2