Marko Topo vs Facundo Mena — Heilbronn CH Quarter-final

Heilbronn CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
GER
Marko Topo
#374ATP
1463ELO
1399Clay ELO
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 June 2025
clay
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
Topo M.
6-3 3-6 6-3
Mena F.
Topo M.
6362
Mena F.
3631

Marko Topo defeated Facundo Mena 6-3 3-6 6-3 in the Heilbronn CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Marko Topo closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Topo M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Mena F.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Topo M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Topo M.Mena F.
1st serve in·Even
60%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
67%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
6.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (64 vs 69). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Topo M.Mena F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
28
9
Break points saved·Dominant
87
57
Break points won·Even
4
7
Deciding sets·Clear edge
12
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Topo M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Mena F.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4Clay Elo 1399
Surface ELO
4.6+7 Clay Elo edge
5.8Overall Elo 1463
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1427
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
4.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.2
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Topo M.Mena F.
Freshness·Slight edge
79
70

Topo M.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 35 games (7d) · Mena F.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Buse I.
Den Ouden G.
7-57-5
Semi-finals
Buse I.
Trungelliti M.
6-47-63
Den Ouden G.
Topo M.
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Trungelliti M.
Pacheco Mendez R.
2-66-46-2
Buse I.
Passaro F.[6]
3-66-16-4
Topo M.
Mena F.
6-33-66-3
Den Ouden G.
Nava E.[5]
7-56-3
R16
Topo M.
Stricker D.
6-757-640-0
Den Ouden G.
Onclin G.
6-36-2
Passaro F.[6]
Durasovic V.
6-36-4
Buse I.
Yevseyev D.
6-06-3
Nava E.[5]
Dedura Palomero D.
6-46-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Nagal S.[7]
7-56-726-0
Mena F.
Rincon D.
7-57-60
Trungelliti M.
Royer V.[4]
6-14-66-4
R32
Buse I.
Skatov T.
6-17-64
Durasovic V.
Houkes M.
6-26-4
Nava E.[5]
Sharipov M.
6-36-3
Royer V.[4]
Wiskandt M.
7-655-76-4
Rincon D.
Nardi L.[1]
6-33-66-3
Topo M.
Pellegrino A.[8]
6-36-0
Pacheco Mendez R.
Martin Tiffon P.
3-66-36-1
Den Ouden G.
Moller E.[3]
7-657-5
Trungelliti M.
Choinski J.
7-660-66-2
Stricker D.
Vatutin A.
6-37-5
Dedura Palomero D.
Squire H.
7-57-5
Nagal S.[7]
Gentzsch T.
6-16-4
Mena F.
Engel J.
6-36-3
Passaro F.[6]
Broska F.
6-747-626-1
Onclin G.
Maestrelli F.
3-66-47-66
Yevseyev D.
Carreno Busta P.[2]
7-57-5