Patrick Kypson vs Paul Jubb — Tyler CH Round of 16

Tyler CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Patrick Kypson
USA
Patrick Kypson
#112ATP
1641ELO
1611Hard ELO
$260kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 June 2025
hard
GBR8
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1403Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
Kypson P.
7-5 6-1
Jubb P.
Kypson P.
762
Jubb P.
510

Patrick Kypson defeated Paul Jubb 7-5 6-1 in the Tyler CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Patrick Kypson came in ranked #112.

Key context

  • Match story: Patrick Kypson came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kypson P.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Jubb P.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kypson P.

Serve advantage — Kypson P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kypson P.Jubb P.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
58%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
68%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.2
3.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 36). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kypson P.Jubb P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
42
37
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
84
Break points won·Dominant
41
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
44
Tiebreaks·Even
77
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kypson P.
7.9
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Jubb P.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+208 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Hard Elo 1403
7.5Overall Elo 1641
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1426
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.6
Surface form
2.8
10.013-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
2.9
Minutes 14d
8.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kypson P.Jubb P.
Freshness·Slight edge
93
100

Kypson P.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Jubb P.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Wu Y.
Zhou Y.
6-43-66-3
Semi-finals
Zhou Y.
Kypson P.
W/O
Wu Y.
Sell K.
7-616-4
Quarter-finals
Sell K.
Martin A.
6-44-66-4
Zhou Y.
Noguchi R.[6]
7-56-2
Wu Y.
Rybakov A.
7-626-2
Kypson P.
Svajda T.
6-47-5
R16
Martin A.
Jodar R.
7-52-67-5
Svajda T.
Ivashka I.
7-56-3
Noguchi R.[6]
Dostanic S.
5-76-26-1
Wu Y.
Escoffier A.[4]
7-637-5
Kypson P.
Jubb P.[8]
7-56-1
Zhou Y.
Shimizu Y.[3]
6-36-4
Sell K.
Krueger M.[1]
6-36-2
Rybakov A.
Mejia N.[7]
6-36-4
R32
Ivashka I.
Bigun K.
3-66-14-1
Svajda T.
Draxl L.[2]
1-1
Sell K.
Mayo A.
2-66-46-2
Jodar R.
Andrade A.
6-36-4
Escoffier A.[4]
Strode I.
6-26-4
Kypson P.
Bouzige M.
6-46-746-4
Noguchi R.[6]
Langmo C.
3-66-26-0
Mejia N.[7]
Zink T.
6-37-66
Dostanic S.
Zheng M.
7-636-4
Jubb P.[8]
Chung H.
4-66-46-4
Martin A.
Dougaz A.[5]
6-26-2
Wu Y.
Maloney P.
7-54-66-2
Rybakov A.
Nanda G.
6-46-3
Shimizu Y.[3]
Tudorica A.
3-66-26-3
Zhou Y.
Hilderbrand T.
6-16-4
Krueger M.[1]
Wu T.
7-645-76-1