Andres Martin vs Rafael Jodar — Tyler CH Round of 16

Tyler CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Andres Martin
USA
Andres Martin
1337ELO
1332Hard ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 June 2025
hard
Rafael Jodar
ESP
Rafael Jodar
#25ATP
1999ELO
1873Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$1.9MCAREER
19 yrs · 191 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Martin A.
7-5 2-6 7-5
Jodar R.
Martin A.
7272
Jodar R.
5651

Andres Martin defeated Rafael Jodar 7-5 2-6 7-5 in the Tyler CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Andres Martin closed it out in three sets, 7–5 2–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Martin A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Jodar R.

Jodar R.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Martin A.

Serve advantage — Jodar R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Martin A.Jodar R.
—
Serve
18
—
Return
44

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Martin A.Jodar R.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
55%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
3.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 92). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Martin A.Jodar R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
86
Break points saved·Dominant
60
91
Break points won·Dominant
14
71
Deciding sets·Dominant
51
100
Tiebreaks·Dominant
33
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Martin A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Jodar R.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.0Hard Elo 1332
Surface ELO
10.0+541 Hard Elo edge
0.0Overall Elo 1337
ELO gap
10.0Overall Elo 1999
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
5.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
8.9
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Martin A.Jodar R.
Freshness·Even
82
85

Martin A.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Jodar R.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Wu Y.
Zhou Y.
6-43-66-3
Semi-finals
Zhou Y.
Kypson P.
W/O
Wu Y.
Sell K.
7-616-4
Quarter-finals
Sell K.
Martin A.
6-44-66-4
Zhou Y.
Noguchi R.[6]
7-56-2
Wu Y.
Rybakov A.
7-626-2
Kypson P.
Svajda T.
6-47-5
R16
Martin A.
Jodar R.
7-52-67-5
Svajda T.
Ivashka I.
7-56-3
Noguchi R.[6]
Dostanic S.
5-76-26-1
Wu Y.
Escoffier A.[4]
7-637-5
Kypson P.
Jubb P.[8]
7-56-1
Zhou Y.
Shimizu Y.[3]
6-36-4
Sell K.
Krueger M.[1]
6-36-2
Rybakov A.
Mejia N.[7]
6-36-4
R32
Ivashka I.
Bigun K.
3-66-14-1
Svajda T.
Draxl L.[2]
1-1
Sell K.
Mayo A.
2-66-46-2
Jodar R.
Andrade A.
6-36-4
Escoffier A.[4]
Strode I.
6-26-4
Kypson P.
Bouzige M.
6-46-746-4
Noguchi R.[6]
Langmo C.
3-66-26-0
Mejia N.[7]
Zink T.
6-37-66
Dostanic S.
Zheng M.
7-636-4
Jubb P.[8]
Chung H.
4-66-46-4
Martin A.
Dougaz A.[5]
6-26-2
Wu Y.
Maloney P.
7-54-66-2
Rybakov A.
Nanda G.
6-46-3
Shimizu Y.[3]
Tudorica A.
3-66-26-3
Zhou Y.
Hilderbrand T.
6-16-4
Krueger M.[1]
Wu T.
7-645-76-1