Colton Smith vs Lloyd Harris — Birmingham CH Quarter-final

Birmingham CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA
Colton Smith
#181ATP
1577ELO
1543Grass ELO
$154kYTD
$480kCAREER
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 June 2025
grass
Lloyd Harris
RSA
Lloyd Harris
#187ATP
1665ELO
1608Grass ELO
$130kYTD
$4.7MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
Smith C.
6-3 6-7 6-4
Harris L.
Smith C.
66362
Harris L.
37741

Colton Smith defeated Lloyd Harris 6-3 6-7 6-4 in the Birmingham CH quarter-final on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Colton Smith closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Smith C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Harris L.

Harris L.serving88% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Smith C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Smith C.Harris L.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
66%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.0
10.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (80 vs 59). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Smith C.Harris L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
62
57
Break points saved·Even
94
95
Break points won·Dominant
52
24
Deciding sets·Even
92
94
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
8
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Smith C.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Harris L.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
3.4Grass Elo 1543
Surface ELO
6.6+65 Grass Elo edge
2.6Overall Elo 1577
ELO gap
7.4Overall Elo 1665
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
7.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
4.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Smith C.Harris L.
Freshness·
100
—

Smith C.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Virtanen O.
Smith C.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Smith C.
Hijikata R.[3]
6-36-4
Virtanen O.
Holt B.
6-44-67-63
Quarter-finals
Smith C.
Harris L.
6-36-736-4
Virtanen O.
Wong C.
6-27-5
Holt B.
Mannarino A.
6-46-3
Hijikata R.[3]
Bolt A.
7-626-4
R16
Smith C.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-30-1
Mannarino A.
Jarry N.
7-666-3
Wong C.
Svajda Z.
4-66-36-2
Hijikata R.[3]
Watanuki Y.
6-16-3
Bolt A.
Tu L.
6-26-3
Virtanen O.
Huesler M.
6-36-766-1
Harris L.
Landaluce M.
6-46-2
Holt B.
Cassone M.
6-26-2
R32
Mannarino A.
Nishioka Y.[2]
7-613-2
Cassone M.
Evans D.
7-657-65
Harris L.
Clarke J.
6-43-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Oconnell C.[5]
6-46-3
Bolt A.
Mcdonald M.[8]
6-47-63
Svajda Z.
Majchrzak K.[7]
6-47-63
Huesler M.
Mayot H.
7-616-4
Holt B.
Duckworth J.[6]
6-27-5
Watanuki Y.
Blockx A.
6-46-4
Wong C.
Monday J.
6-15-76-3
Virtanen O.
Vukic A.[4]
7-646-3
Tu L.
Spizzirri E.
6-36-3
Hijikata R.[3]
Harris B.
6-13-66-4
Landaluce M.
Bellucci M.[1]
4-66-47-65
Smith C.
Uchiyama Y.
6-26-736-4
Jarry N.
Schoolkate T.
6-786-46-4