Li Tu vs Oliver Crawford — Birmingham CH Qualifying Round 1

Birmingham CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
AUS2
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1516Grass ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 June 2025
grass
Oliver Crawford
GBR
Oliver Crawford
#235ATP
1444ELO
1457Grass ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLLL
Tu L.
6-4 7-6
Crawford O.
Tu L.
67142
Crawford O.
46120

Li Tu defeated Oliver Crawford 6-4 7-6 in the Birmingham CH qualifying round 1 on grass. The result followed the form book — Li Tu came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Li Tu extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-05-27Roland GarrosQ1clayLi Tu6-7(4) 6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Crawford O.

Crawford O.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Crawford O.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
54%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.8
4.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (61 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tu L.Crawford O.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
12
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
64
Break points won·Slight edge
8
18
Deciding sets·Even
20
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
64
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Crawford O.
3.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
6.0+59 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Grass Elo 1457
6.1Overall Elo 1488
ELO gap
3.9Overall Elo 1444
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Cassone M.[10]
Zahraj P.
6-46-3
Uchiyama Y.[9]
Pinnington Jones J.
1-66-47-62
Bolt A.[7]
Hussey G.
7-56-3
Watanuki Y.[6]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-634-66-1
Svajda Z.[11]
Tu L.[2]
4-66-47-5
Wong C.[3]
Lajal M.[8]
6-47-5
Q1
Cassone M.[10]
Parker S.
6-36-1
Tu L.[2]
Crawford O.
6-47-612
Wong C.[3]
Peniston R.
7-636-4
Hussey G.
Atmane T.[1]
3-66-46-3
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Zhukayev B.[12]
6-36-1
Lajal M.[8]
Searle H.
5-77-56-3
Zahraj P.
Mccabe J.[5]
7-647-67
Bolt A.[7]
Broom C.
6-37-64
Uchiyama Y.[9]
Edmund K.
6-36-2
Watanuki Y.[6]
Gray A.
6-46-736-1
Svajda Z.[11]
Mchugh A.
6-16-1
Pinnington Jones J.
Grenier H.[4]
6-16-4