Lloyd Harris vs Jay Clarke — Birmingham CH Round of 32

Birmingham CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Lloyd Harris
RSA
Lloyd Harris
#187ATP
1665ELO
1608Grass ELO
$130kYTD
$4.7MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 June 2025
grass
GBR
Jay Clarke
#239ATP
1458ELO
1360Grass ELO
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLLWL
Harris L.
6-4 3-6 6-4
Clarke J.
Harris L.
6362
Clarke J.
4641

Lloyd Harris defeated Jay Clarke 6-4 3-6 6-4 in the Birmingham CH round of 32 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Lloyd Harris closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Harris L.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Clarke J.

Clarke J.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Harris L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Harris L.Clarke J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.5
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (59 vs 79). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Harris L.Clarke J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
8
Break points saved·Dominant
95
63
Break points won·Even
24
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
10
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
24
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Harris L.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Clarke J.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.8+248 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.2Grass Elo 1360
8.1Overall Elo 1665
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1458
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
2.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
4.2
4.0
3-set count
Prev. match
9.0
3.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Virtanen O.
Smith C.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Smith C.
Hijikata R.[3]
6-36-4
Virtanen O.
Holt B.
6-44-67-63
Quarter-finals
Smith C.
Harris L.
6-36-736-4
Virtanen O.
Wong C.
6-27-5
Holt B.
Mannarino A.
6-46-3
Hijikata R.[3]
Bolt A.
7-626-4
R16
Smith C.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-30-1
Mannarino A.
Jarry N.
7-666-3
Wong C.
Svajda Z.
4-66-36-2
Hijikata R.[3]
Watanuki Y.
6-16-3
Bolt A.
Tu L.
6-26-3
Virtanen O.
Huesler M.
6-36-766-1
Harris L.
Landaluce M.
6-46-2
Holt B.
Cassone M.
6-26-2
R32
Mannarino A.
Nishioka Y.[2]
7-613-2
Cassone M.
Evans D.
7-657-65
Harris L.
Clarke J.
6-43-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Oconnell C.[5]
6-46-3
Bolt A.
Mcdonald M.[8]
6-47-63
Svajda Z.
Majchrzak K.[7]
6-47-63
Huesler M.
Mayot H.
7-616-4
Holt B.
Duckworth J.[6]
6-27-5
Watanuki Y.
Blockx A.
6-46-4
Wong C.
Monday J.
6-15-76-3
Virtanen O.
Vukic A.[4]
7-646-3
Tu L.
Spizzirri E.
6-36-3
Hijikata R.[3]
Harris B.
6-13-66-4
Landaluce M.
Bellucci M.[1]
4-66-47-65
Smith C.
Uchiyama Y.
6-26-736-4
Jarry N.
Schoolkate T.
6-786-46-4