Jodie Burrage vs Jana Fett — Birmingham 125 Round of 32

Birmingham 125 · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jodie Burrage
GBR
Jodie Burrage
#821WTA
1484ELO
1433Grass ELO
27 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 June 2025
grass
CRO
Jana Fett
#415WTA
1580ELO
1496Grass ELO
29 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLL
Burrage J.
6-3 6-4
Fett J.
Burrage J.
662
Fett J.
34–

Jodie Burrage defeated Jana Fett 6-3 6-4 in the Birmingham 125 round of 32 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Jodie Burrage closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Burrage J.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Fett J.

Fett J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Burrage J.

Serve advantage — Fett J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Burrage J.Fett J.
1st serve in·Even
56%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
42%
42%
Service points won·Even
56%
56%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
46%
Break points saved·Even
54%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.4
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.6
7.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (30 vs 42). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Burrage J.Fett J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
10
28
Break points saved·Slight edge
44
36
Break points won·Clear edge
65
87
Deciding sets·Dominant
4
47
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
46
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Burrage J.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Fett J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
4.6Grass Elo 1433
Surface ELO
5.4+63 Grass Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1484
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1580
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
0.8
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
4.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Minnen G.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Fruhvirtova L.
Ponchet J.
6-20-66-4
Minnen G.
Masarova R.
3-67-677-65
Quarter-finals
Ponchet J.
Xu M.
6-26-4
Fruhvirtova L.
Stefanini L.
6-46-3
Minnen G.
Birrell K.
6-35-76-3
Masarova R.
Montgomery R.
6-20-0
R16
Xu M.
Kawa K.
4-67-56-2
Ponchet J.
Watson H.
6-45-77-5
Fruhvirtova L.
Burrage J.
6-06-4
Masarova R.
Golubic V.
6-27-61
Montgomery R.
Sonmez Z.
7-664-66-4
Minnen G.
Martincova T.
3-67-656-3
Birrell K.
Wei S.
7-56-2
Stefanini L.
Ryser V.
6-37-64
R32
Montgomery R.
Gibson T.
6-42-67-61
Ryser V.
Maria T.
7-627-5
Kawa K.
Andreeva E.
7-56-4
Ponchet J.
Diatchenko V.
6-36-2
Watson H.
Gadecki O.
6-06-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Eala A.
7-56-756-1
Stefanini L.
Banks A.
6-26-4
Golubic V.
Tan H.
6-26-3
Masarova R.
Snigur D.
3-66-26-4
Minnen G.
Hartono A.
6-46-2
Martincova T.
Marino R.
3-66-46-1
Wei S.
Ishii S.
6-36-4
Birrell K.
Inglis M.
6-16-4
Xu M.
Parks A.
6-27-66
Burrage J.
Fett J.
6-36-4
Sonmez Z.
Cabrera L.
6-37-5