Kimberly Birrell vs Maddison Inglis — Birmingham 125 Round of 32

Birmingham 125 · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Kimberly Birrell
AUS
Kimberly Birrell
#65WTA
1754ELO
1602Grass ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 June 2025
grass
Maddison Inglis
AUS
Maddison Inglis
#151WTA
1590ELO
1489Grass ELO
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Birrell K.
6-1 6-4
Inglis M.
Birrell K.
662
Inglis M.
14–

Kimberly Birrell defeated Maddison Inglis 6-1 6-4 in the Birmingham 125 round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Kimberly Birrell came in ranked #65. Kimberly Birrell claimed a first win over Maddison Inglis in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-19Australian OpenR128hardMaddison Inglis7-6(6) 6-7(9) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Birrell K.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Inglis M.

Inglis M.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Birrell K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Birrell K.Inglis M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
49%
Service points won·Even
57%
60%
Return points won·Even
44%
42%
Break points saved·Even
54%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.3
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.9
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (88 vs 67). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Birrell K.Inglis M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
22
Break points saved·Dominant
77
50
Break points won·Dominant
83
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
65
35
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
77
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Birrell K.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Inglis M.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
6.9+113 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Grass Elo 1489
7.4Overall Elo 1754
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1590
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.7
Surface form
5.6
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Birrell K.Inglis M.
Freshness·Slight edge
95
100

Birrell K.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Inglis M.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Minnen G.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Fruhvirtova L.
Ponchet J.
6-20-66-4
Minnen G.
Masarova R.
3-67-677-65
Quarter-finals
Ponchet J.
Xu M.
6-26-4
Fruhvirtova L.
Stefanini L.
6-46-3
Minnen G.
Birrell K.
6-35-76-3
Masarova R.
Montgomery R.
6-20-0
R16
Xu M.
Kawa K.
4-67-56-2
Ponchet J.
Watson H.
6-45-77-5
Fruhvirtova L.
Burrage J.
6-06-4
Masarova R.
Golubic V.
6-27-61
Montgomery R.
Sonmez Z.
7-664-66-4
Minnen G.
Martincova T.
3-67-656-3
Birrell K.
Wei S.
7-56-2
Stefanini L.
Ryser V.
6-37-64
R32
Montgomery R.
Gibson T.
6-42-67-61
Ryser V.
Maria T.
7-627-5
Kawa K.
Andreeva E.
7-56-4
Ponchet J.
Diatchenko V.
6-36-2
Watson H.
Gadecki O.
6-06-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Eala A.
7-56-756-1
Stefanini L.
Banks A.
6-26-4
Golubic V.
Tan H.
6-26-3
Masarova R.
Snigur D.
3-66-26-4
Minnen G.
Hartono A.
6-46-2
Martincova T.
Marino R.
3-66-46-1
Wei S.
Ishii S.
6-36-4
Birrell K.
Inglis M.
6-16-4
Xu M.
Parks A.
6-27-66
Burrage J.
Fett J.
6-36-4
Sonmez Z.
Cabrera L.
6-37-5