Liam Draxl vs Rafael Jodar — Little Rock CH Round of 32

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Liam Draxl
CAN2
Liam Draxl
#223ATP
1592ELO
1565Hard ELO
$201kYTD
$642kCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 May 2025
hard
Rafael Jodar
ESP
Rafael Jodar
#25ATP
1999ELO
1873Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$1.9MCAREER
19 yrs · 191 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Draxl L.
7-5 6-2
Jodar R.
Draxl L.
762
Jodar R.
520

Liam Draxl defeated Rafael Jodar 7-5 6-2 in the Little Rock CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Rafael Jodar came in ranked #25.

Key context

  • Match story: Liam Draxl closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Draxl L.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Jodar R.

Jodar R.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Draxl L.

Serve advantage — Jodar R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Draxl L.Jodar R.
—
Serve
19
—
Return
45

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Draxl L.Jodar R.
1st serve in·Even
66%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
55%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
42%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
3.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 92). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draxl L.Jodar R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
66
86
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
91
Break points won·Dominant
36
71
Deciding sets·Slight edge
94
100
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
75
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draxl L.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Jodar R.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
1.2Hard Elo 1565
Surface ELO
8.8+308 Hard Elo edge
0.2Overall Elo 1592
ELO gap
9.8Overall Elo 1999
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
6.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draxl L.Jodar R.
Freshness·Slight edge
98
89

Draxl L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Jodar R.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.
Zheng M.
6-11-67-5
Semi-finals
Kypson P.
Andrade A.
6-36-2
Zheng M.
Draxl L.[2]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Draxl L.[2]
Miyoshi K.
7-646-4
Kypson P.
Noguchi R.
6-16-2
Zheng M.
Martin A.
6-46-2
Andrade A.
Nakagawa N.
6-46-1
R16
Andrade A.
Kozlov S.
6-14-67-5
Zheng M.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-26-1
Martin A.
Shimizu Y.[3]
6-16-4
Noguchi R.
Jubb P.[8]
7-56-3
Draxl L.[2]
Maloney P.
6-46-1
Miyoshi K.
Milavsky D.
6-26-4
Kypson P.
Zink T.
6-46-4
Nakagawa N.
Galarneau A.[4]
6-36-4
R32
Miyoshi K.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[5]
7-55-1
Zink T.
Wu T.
7-635-4
Jubb P.[8]
Sell K.
7-56-3
Nakagawa N.
Kotzen A.
6-46-4
Draxl L.[2]
Jodar R.
7-56-2
Kozlov S.
Dougaz A.[7]
5-76-36-2
Zheng M.
Langmo C.
6-26-2
Kypson P.
Krueger M.[1]
6-34-66-4
Shimizu Y.[3]
Mejia N.
7-646-0
Milavsky D.
Bouzige M.
6-46-4
Noguchi R.
Zhou Y.
6-46-4
Martin A.
Chung H.
6-36-2
Andrade A.
Ivashka I.
7-646-2
Maloney P.
Kicker N.
5-76-26-3
Soriano Barrera A.
Escoffier A.[6]
7-57-64
Galarneau A.[4]
Nanda G.
6-36-3